Benchmark: no-translate3 - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="wpadminbar" translate="no">
  <div>
    <p>TEST</p>
  	<div>
    	<div id="test">TEST 2</div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

<script>
        Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
			const node = document.getElementById('test');
  };
</script>

Tests:

all
if (!!node.closest) { let hasNoTranslate, closestNoTranslate; switch (true) { case node.closest('[translate="no"]') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('[translate="no"]'); break case node.closest('.notranslate') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('.notranslate'); break case node.closest('.skiptranslate') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('.skiptranslate'); break case node.closest('#wpadminbar') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('#wpadminbar'); break default: hasNoTranslate = false; } if (!hasNoTranslate) { return false; } const closestYesTranslate = node.closest('[translate="yes"]'); if (closestYesTranslate) { return closestYesTranslate.contains(closestNoTranslate); } }
no-translate
if (!!node.closest) { const closestNoTranslate = node.closest('[translate="no"]'); if (!closestNoTranslate) { return false; } const closestYesTranslate = node.closest('[translate="yes"]'); if (closestYesTranslate) { return closestYesTranslate.contains(closestNoTranslate); } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
all
no-translate

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

The provided JSON represents two benchmark definitions, each with its own set of test cases and comparison options.

**Benchmark Definition**

The first benchmark definition, "no-translate3", has an empty script preparation code and an HTML preparation code that sets up a simple webpage with two paragraphs and a div element containing another paragraph. The JavaScript code in the script tag defines a `setup` function that selects a specific element (`node`) from the document.

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **"all"`**: This test case uses the `closest` method to search for elements with different attributes (`translate="no"`, `translate="yes"`, and `notranslate`/`.skiptranslate`). It checks if an element with `translate="no"` is present, and then checks if an element with `translate="yes"` contains it.
2. **"no-translate"`**: This test case is similar to the "all" test case, but it only checks for elements with `translate="no"`.

**Comparison Options**

The two benchmark definitions compare the performance of using multiple attributes (`translate`, `notranslate`, `.skiptranslate`) versus a single attribute (`translate`).

**Pros and Cons**

Using multiple attributes:

* Pros:
	+ More precise control over element selection
	+ Allows for more flexible filtering
* Cons:
	+ May lead to slower performance due to the additional lookup
	+ Requires more code

Using a single attribute:

* Pros:
	+ Faster performance due to reduced lookup overhead
	+ Less code required
* Cons:
	+ Less precise control over element selection
	+ May require additional filtering logic

**Library Usage**

None of the benchmark definitions use any external libraries.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The `closest` method is a native JavaScript method that allows traversing up the DOM tree to find an ancestor element with a specific attribute. This feature is supported in modern browsers and can be used to improve performance in certain scenarios.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need more advanced filtering options, you may consider using libraries like jQuery or Velocity, which provide additional methods for element selection and manipulation. However, these libraries can also introduce additional overhead and slower performance.

Keep in mind that the choice of comparison option ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements. If you prioritize precision and flexibility over raw speed, using multiple attributes might be a better choice. Conversely, if you need to optimize for performance and are willing to sacrifice some precision, using a single attribute could be a better approach.

Related benchmarks:

no-translate3 (version: 0)

no-translate3

Comparing performance of: all vs no-translate

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

all

no-translate

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):