Benchmark: no-translate - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="wpadminbar">
  <div>
    <p>TEST</p>
  	<div>
    	<div id="test">TEST 2</div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

<script>
        Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
			const node = document.getElementById('test');
  };
</script>

Tests:

all
if (!!node.closest) { let hasNoTranslate, closestNoTranslate; switch (true) { case node.closest('[translate="no"]') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('[translate="no"]'); break case node.closest('.notranslate') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('.notranslate'); break case node.closest('.skiptranslate') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('.skiptranslate'); break case node.closest('#wpadminbar') !== null: hasNoTranslate = true; closestNoTranslate = node.closest('#wpadminbar'); break default: hasNoTranslate = false; } if (!hasNoTranslate) { return false; } const closestYesTranslate = node.closest('[translate="yes"]'); if (closestYesTranslate) { return closestYesTranslate.contains(closestNoTranslate); } }
no-translate
if (!!node.closest) { const closestNoTranslate = node.closest('[translate="no"]'); if (!closestNoTranslate) { return false; } const closestYesTranslate = node.closest('[translate="yes"]'); if (closestYesTranslate) { return closestYesTranslate.contains(closestNoTranslate); } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
all
no-translate

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for JavaScript performance, specifically focusing on the functionality of the `closest` method in jQuery or vanilla JavaScript.

**Benchmark Definition:**
The benchmark definition is written in JavaScript and contains two main parts:

1. **Setup**: The code sets up the test environment by retrieving an HTML element with the id "test" from the document.
2. **Benchmarking Logic**: The logic of the benchmark is defined within the `if (!!node.closest) { ... }` block. This logic checks if the closest ancestor of a node that contains a certain class (or attribute in this case) exists.

**Options Compared:**
The benchmark compares two options:

1. **Option 1:** The original code with multiple `closest` calls and nested conditions.
2. **Option 2:** A simplified version of the same code, which removes some of the conditional statements and directly checks for the presence of certain elements.

**Pros and Cons of Each Option:**

* **Option 1 (Original Code):**
	+ Pros:
		- More comprehensive coverage of possible scenarios.
		- May be more readable due to explicit conditional statements.
	+ Cons:
		- Possibly slower execution speed due to the increased number of DOM queries.
		- May have higher overhead for maintenance and updates.
* **Option 2 (Simplified Code):**
	+ Pros:
		- Generally faster execution speed, as it minimizes the number of DOM queries.
		- More concise and easier to maintain.
	+ Cons:
		- Less comprehensive coverage of possible scenarios, potentially leading to false negatives or positives.

**Library and Its Purpose:**
The `closest` method is a part of jQuery, which is used for selecting elements in HTML documents. In this benchmark, the code uses `closest` without explicitly referencing jQuery, but it's likely that the browser being tested (Chrome 111) has jQuery installed and enabled.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax:**
There is no explicit mention of any special JavaScript features or syntax in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers have built-in support for certain advanced CSS selectors (e.g., `[translate="yes"]`), which may affect the performance of this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives:**

* **Alternative 1:** Using a different selector notation or method to find the closest ancestor element.
* **Alternative 2:** Implementing a custom solution using a tree-like data structure to traverse the DOM instead of relying on `closest`.
* **Alternative 3:** Using a library like React or Angular, which provide their own solutions for finding ancestors in the DOM.

To improve the benchmark, you could consider optimizing the code further by:

* Removing unnecessary DOM queries.
* Using more efficient algorithms for finding closest ancestors.
* Adding more test cases to cover edge cases and invalid input scenarios.
* Running the benchmark on multiple browsers and devices to ensure wider coverage.

Related benchmarks:

no-translate (version: 0)

no-translate

Comparing performance of: all vs no-translate

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

all