Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs push test5
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
spread operator true vs spread operator false vs Push true vs push false
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator true
const abc = true; const test = { a: { domain: undefined, iconName: "a", }, b: { domain: "b", iconName: "b", }, c: { domain: "c", iconName: "c", }, d: { domain: "d", iconName: "d", }, e: { domain: "e", iconName: "e", }, ...(abc ? {f: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), ...(abc ? {g: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), ...(abc ? {h: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), };
spread operator false
const abc = false; const test = { a: { domain: undefined, iconName: "a", }, b: { domain: "b", iconName: "b", }, c: { domain: "c", iconName: "c", }, d: { domain: "d", iconName: "d", }, e: { domain: "e", iconName: "e", }, ...(abc ? {f: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), ...(abc ? {g: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), ...(abc ? {h: { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }} : {}), };
Push true
const abc = true; const test = { a: { domain: undefined, iconName: "a", }, b: { domain: "b", iconName: "b", }, c: { domain: "c", iconName: "c", }, d: { domain: "d", iconName: "d", }, e: { domain: "e", iconName: "e", }, }; if (abc) { test.f = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; } if (abc) { test.g = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; } if (abc) { test.h = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; }
push false
const abc = false; const test = { a: { domain: undefined, iconName: "a", }, b: { domain: "b", iconName: "b", }, c: { domain: "c", iconName: "c", }, d: { domain: "d", iconName: "d", }, e: { domain: "e", iconName: "e", }, }; if (abc) { test.f = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; } if (abc) { test.g = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; } if (abc) { test.h = { domain: "f", iconName: "f", }; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator true
spread operator false
Push true
push false
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark compares the performance of two ways to add properties to an object: 1. Using the spread operator (`...`) 2. Using the `concat()` method with `push` **Options Compared:** * **Spread Operator (`...`):** This is a new way to merge objects in JavaScript, introduced in ES6. It allows you to spread the properties of one object into another. * **Concatenation using `concat()`**: This involves creating a new object by concatenating two or more objects together using the `concat()` method. **Pros and Cons:** * **Spread Operator (`...`):** + Pros: - More concise and readable code - Less memory overhead, as it doesn't create a new array + Cons: - May have performance issues due to the complexity of the merge logic - Not supported in older browsers or environments * **Concatenation using `concat()`**: + Pros: - Widely supported across browsers and environments - Easy to understand and implement + Cons: - More verbose code - Creates a new array, which can lead to increased memory overhead **Benchmark Results:** The benchmark results show the performance of each option on different browsers and devices. The `Push true` test uses concatenation with `push`, while the other tests use the spread operator. In this specific benchmark, the Chrome 100 browser on Windows Desktop shows: * **Spread Operator (`...`):** 3833343.25 executions per second * **Concatenation using `concat()`**: 4594602.5 executions per second * **Push true:** 6544135.5 executions per second Overall, the results suggest that concatenation with `push` is the fastest way to add properties to an object in this specific benchmark. **Conclusion:** While the spread operator (`...`) has its advantages, the benchmark suggests that concatenation using `concat()` might still be the better choice for performance-critical code in certain scenarios. However, it's essential to note that browser and environment support can vary greatly, so it's crucial to test your specific use case before making a decision.
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
Array concat vs spread operator vs push larger list
Array push vs spread when reducing over results
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?