Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread operator vs push with self assign (for Svelte)
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs Push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Push
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].push(...params); other = other
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares two approaches for using the spread operator (`...`) in JavaScript: 1. The "Spread Operator" approach uses the spread operator directly on an array: `var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];` 2. The "Push" approach uses the `push()` method with the spread operator: `var other = [ 1, 2 ].push(...params);` **Other Considerations** Before we dive into the pros and cons of each approach, it's worth noting that: * Both approaches are used to create a new array by concatenating two arrays. * The spread operator is a newer feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), while the `push()` method with spread has been around for longer but gained popularity with the introduction of ES6. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Spread Operator (`...`) **Pros:** 1. **Readability**: The code is more concise and readable, as it directly expresses the intent of concatenating arrays. 2. **Efficiency**: In modern JavaScript engines, the spread operator is optimized for performance. **Cons:** 1. **Browser Support**: Although widely supported in modern browsers, older browsers might not support it. 2. **Compatibility**: Some older browsers or environments might require additional workarounds to support the spread operator. ### Push with Spread (`...`) **Pros:** 1. **Browser Compatibility**: This approach is generally more compatible with older browsers and environments, as `push()` has been around for longer. 2. **Fallback Behavior**: Modern JavaScript engines often use a fallback behavior to support older browsers that don't understand the spread operator. **Cons:** 1. **Code Bloat**: The `push()` method adds unnecessary complexity, making the code slightly less readable. 2. **Performance Overhead**: Using `push()` can introduce performance overhead due to the additional function call. **Library and Special Features** There are no libraries or special features being used in these benchmarks. The focus is solely on comparing two basic approaches for using the spread operator in JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you needed to achieve array concatenation in older browsers or environments that don't support the spread operator, you could use other alternatives like: 1. `concat()`: A built-in method for concatenating arrays. 2. Loops: Using loops to manually iterate over elements and build a new array. However, these alternatives are generally less efficient and more verbose than using the spread operator or `push()` with spread. In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches for using the spread operator in JavaScript: directly applying it to an array (`...`) versus using `push()` with spread. The pros and cons of each approach highlight their respective trade-offs between readability, efficiency, browser support, and compatibility.
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
spread operator vs push
Array push vs spread when reducing over results
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?