Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread vs push - simple2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread vs push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread
var arr = []; new Array(1000).fill(1).forEach((item) => { arr = [...arr, item] })
push
var arr = []; new Array(1000).fill(1).forEach((item) => { arr.push(item) })
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread
push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for adding elements to an array: using the spread operator (`...`) and using the `push` method. The benchmark is designed to test which approach is faster on a large array of 1000 elements. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Spread Operator**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to add elements to an array. This operator creates a new array by copying elements from an existing array and spreading them out. 2. **Push Method**: Using the `push` method to add elements to an array. This method adds one or more elements to the end of an array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Spread Operator:** Pros: * More concise and readable code * Can be faster for large arrays because it avoids the overhead of a function call Cons: * May not work as expected in all situations (e.g., when used with `Array.prototype.concat`) * Can lead to unnecessary memory allocation **Push Method:** Pros: * Well-supported by most browsers and environments * Can be faster in some cases due to cache optimization Cons: * Less concise and less readable code compared to the spread operator * May require more overhead due to function call **Library Usage** There is no library used in this benchmark. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses a JavaScript feature that is widely supported: the spread operator (`...`). **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to perform operations on an array frequently, using the `push` method might be more efficient due to cache optimization. * However, if readability and conciseness are important, using the spread operator is likely a better choice. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for adding elements to an array, here are some options: 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: This method concatenates two or more arrays and returns a new array. 2. **Array.from()**: This method creates a new array from an iterable (e.g., an array, string, or object). 3. **Set**: In modern JavaScript, you can use the `Set` data structure to add elements efficiently. These alternatives might be useful in specific situations, but they often come with their own trade-offs and considerations.
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
spread vs push - simple
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?