Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs pusha
(version: 0)
testaa
Comparing performance of:
test1 vs test2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
test1
a=[1,2,3,4,1,2,3]; b = [...new Set([...a])]
test2
a=[1,2,3,4,1,2,3]; b=[]; b.push(...new Set([...a]));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test1
test2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of those approaches, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two JavaScript approaches: using `Array.prototype.push()` with spreading the array elements, and using `Set` objects with the spread operator (`...`). The benchmark uses a simple test case: creating an array from 1 to 6, then creating a new set from that array, and finally pushing all unique elements of the original array onto another empty array. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. `a = [...new Set([...a])]`: This approach uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new set from the array elements, and then uses the spread operator again to push all unique elements of the original array onto an empty array. 2. `b = []; b.push(...new Set([...a]))`: This approach creates a new empty array `b` and then pushes all unique elements of the original array onto it using the spread operator. **Pros and Cons** ### Option 1: Using `Array.prototype.push()` with Spreading Pros: * Faster execution time, since `push()` is a built-in method optimized for performance. * More intuitive code, as it directly modifies the original array. Cons: * May lead to incorrect results if the array's length is not preserved, which can happen when using `set()`. * Can be less efficient if the array contains many duplicate elements, since `push()` will only add new elements, and some duplicates will be ignored. ### Option 2: Using `Set` Objects with the Spread Operator Pros: * More predictable results, as sets ensure uniqueness of elements. * Can handle large arrays with many duplicate elements efficiently, since sets only store unique values. Cons: * Slower execution time, since creating a set and using its spread operator may introduce additional overhead. * Less intuitive code, as it requires understanding the behavior of sets and their spread operator. **Library Usage** In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly used. However, `Array.prototype.push()` is a built-in method, while `Set` objects are part of the ECMAScript standard. **Special JS Features/Syntax** This benchmark uses the following special JavaScript features: * The spread operator (`...`) in both options. * Using template literals (`\r\n`) to separate lines in the test case code. * The use of `new Set()` and its spread operator to create a set from an array. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs between execution time, predictability, and code readability. If performance is critical and the input data does not contain many duplicates, Option 1 might be preferred. However, if uniqueness of elements is crucial or the input data is large with many duplicate values, Option 2 is likely a better choice. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for this benchmark could include: * Using `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))` to create an array copy and then pushing its unique elements onto another array. * Using `Array.from()` and `Set.prototype.values()` to create a new set from the array and push its unique elements onto another array. * Using a library like Lodash's `uniqBy()` function to remove duplicates from the array before pushing it onto another array. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of execution time, code readability, and maintenance complexity.
Related benchmarks:
Push vs Spread stuff
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread vs push test1
JS array spread operator vs push
zk test spread vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?