Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Push vs Spread stuff
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Push
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
[...[1,2],3]
Push
[1,2].push(3)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining what's being tested in this benchmark. **Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The test measures the performance difference between two approaches: using the spread operator (`[...arr, newElem]`) and using the `push()` method to add an element to an array (`arr.push(newElem)`). **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is represented by a JSON object that contains the code snippet being tested. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `"Using the spread operator"`: The benchmark definition is `[...[1,2],3]`. This creates a new array using the spread operator, where the inner array `[1,2]` is repeated. 2. `"Push"`: The benchmark definition is `[1,2].push(3)`. This adds a new element `3` to the existing array `[1,2]`. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Using the spread operator (`[...arr, newElem]`) * Using the `push()` method (`arr.push(newElem)`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** * **Spread Operator (`[...arr, newElem]`)**: + Pros: - Creates a new array with the desired elements. - Does not modify the original array. - Can be useful when you need to create a shallow copy of an array. + Cons: - Can lead to unnecessary memory allocation and garbage collection. - May have performance implications due to the creation of a new array. * **Push Method (`arr.push(newElem)`)**: + Pros: - Modifies the original array in place, which can be more efficient. - Does not create a new array or object. + Cons: - Changes the original array, which may not be desirable if you need to preserve its integrity. - May lead to slower performance due to the modification of the array. **Other Considerations:** * **Array Size and Performance**: The size of the array being modified can significantly impact performance. Larger arrays may lead to more memory allocation and garbage collection, which can slow down the push operation. * **Browser Support**: Some browsers may have varying levels of support for these operations. For example, older browsers might not support the spread operator or `push()` method on arrays. **Library Usage:** None of the test cases explicitly use any external libraries or frameworks. However, if we were to analyze the code snippets more closely: * The spread operator uses the spread syntax (`[...arr, newElem]`), which is a part of the ECMAScript standard and does not require an external library. * The `push()` method uses the Array.prototype.push() method, which is also a built-in method on the Array prototype. **Special JS Features or Syntax:** None of the test cases explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's described above.
Related benchmarks:
Spread operator vs array push
spread operator vs push test - correct
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
spread vs push large
JS array spread operator vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?