Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
huhuuhi
(version: 0)
hohoi
Comparing performance of:
a vs b
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
a
var a; for (var i=0;i<100000;i++){ a=i; }
b
for (var i=0;i<100000;i++){ var a=i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmark being tested and the options compared. The test case appears to be measuring the performance difference between two approaches: assigning the result of an expression directly to a variable (using `var a = i;`) versus declaring a separate variable to hold the value first (using `var b = i;`). **Option 1: Direct assignment (`var a = i;`)** Pros: * Simple and straightforward code * Less memory allocation overhead since no additional variable is created Cons: * May lead to slower performance due to repeated lookups of the variable `a` * Can result in less predictable behavior if side effects are present (e.g., modifying external state) **Option 2: Declare a separate variable (`var b = i;`)** Pros: * More explicit and easier to read code * Avoids potential issues with repeated lookups or side effects * May provide better performance due to reduced overhead from repeated assignments Cons: * Requires an additional memory allocation for the variable `b` * May introduce a slight overhead due to the extra assignment operation In this specific benchmark, both approaches are being tested, but the results show that Option 2 (`var b = i;`) provides slightly better performance (11973.0908203125 executions per second) compared to Option 1 (`var a = i;`) (11839.5615234375 executions per second). **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. **Special JavaScript features or syntax** None are explicitly used in these benchmark cases. Other alternatives that could be tested for comparison include: * Using const instead of var for both assignments * Using a function to encapsulate the assignment (e.g., `function doSomething(i) { var b = i; }`) * Using a different data structure, such as an array or object, to store the values * Adding side effects to one or both of the assignments (e.g., modifying external state) Note that these alternatives might not be directly relevant to the specific question being asked and may require additional test cases to cover their performance implications.
Related benchmarks:
Proba 123
objvsarray
Lodash "uniqWith" "unionBy" "uniqBy" (100)
RFDC clone (circles: true) vs Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone
RFDC clone (circles: true) vs Lodash cloneDeep (+ cycle)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?