Benchmark: objvsarray - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var user = [{id: '1001', name: 'Octavio', age: 46},{id: '2020', name: 'Mara', age: 39},{id: '3456', name: 'Alanis', age: 12},{id: '9876', name: 'Alondra', age: 10},{id: '6589', name: 'Ariana', age: 7},];

var username = { 1001: "Octavio", 2020: "Mara", 3456: "Alanis", 9876: "Alondra", 6589: "Ariana"};

var userage = { 1001: 46, 2020: 39, 3456: 12, 9876: 10, 6589: 7};

Tests:

array
user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').name; user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').age;
object
username[3456]; userage[3456];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array
object

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring performance differences between objects and arrays in JavaScript.

The benchmark test case, defined in the JSON, measures how fast JavaScript can access elements of an array versus accessing them through an object's index.

Here are the options compared:

**Array Access**

1. **Direct Array Indexing**: `user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis').name;`
	* Pros: Fast and straightforward access.
	* Cons: May incur additional overhead due to searching.
2. **Array Method `indexOf()` or `findIndex()`**: Not used in the test case, but generally faster than direct indexing when the array has a large number of elements.
3. **Array Method `map()` or `reduce()`:** Not used in the test case.

**Object Access**

1. **Direct Object Indexing**: `username[3456];`
	* Pros: Fast and straightforward access.
	* Cons: May incur additional overhead due to searching in the object's internal data structure.
2. **Object Property Access with Bracket Notation**: `userage[3456];` (similar to direct indexing, but with a more verbose syntax)
	* Pros: Similar performance to direct indexing.
	* Cons: Less readable and maintainable.

**Additional Considerations**

* Both array and object access use the same JavaScript engine's internal data structures, which can lead to similar performance characteristics.
* The `find()` method is not used in this test case because it involves searching for an element that doesn't exist (for `user.find(x => x.name === 'Alanis')`), making direct indexing or bracket notation a better choice.

**Library and Syntax Used**

None of the test cases use any external libraries. The syntax used, such as array and object methods, is standard JavaScript.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax Used**

The benchmark definition uses arrow functions (`x => x.name === 'Alanis'`) to define functions inline within the `find()` method. This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and provides a concise way to define small anonymous functions.

**Other Alternatives**

To compare array and object access performance, alternative approaches could include:

1. **Using `forEach()` or `for...of` loops**: Instead of direct indexing or bracket notation.
2. **Creating a sparse array with a large number of elements**: To measure the impact of searching on array access times.
3. **Measuring cache misses using browser tools like Chrome DevTools' Performance tab**: To gain insight into the underlying performance characteristics of JavaScript engines.
4. **Using different JavaScript engines or implementations**, such as Node.js, V8 (Chrome), or SpiderMonkey (Firefox): to compare their performance profiles.

Note that these alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark definition and test cases to accommodate the changes.

Related benchmarks:

objvsarray (version: 0)

objvsarray

Comparing performance of: array vs object

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array

object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):