Benchmark: Lodash "uniqWith" "unionBy" "uniqBy" (100)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 5 }
];

var newUsers = [
  { 'name': 'fred',    'age': 40 },
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 2 }
];

for(let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  var newUser = { 'name': 'user_' + i, 'age': Math.floor(Math.random() * i) };
  newUsers.push(newUser);
}

Tests:

uniqWith
const unionUsers1 = _.uniqWith(newUsers.concat(users), _.isEqual);
unionBy
const unionUsers2 = _.unionBy(newUsers, users, 'name');
uniqBy
const unionUsers1 = _.uniqBy(newUsers.concat(users), 'name');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
uniqWith
unionBy
uniqBy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 140 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
uniqWith	749.0 Ops/sec
unionBy	51164.0 Ops/sec
uniqBy	52280.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Lodash "uniqWith" "unionBy" "uniqBy" (100) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: uniqWith vs unionBy vs uniqBy

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

uniqWith

unionBy

uniqBy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A