Benchmark name | When Created |
---|---|
Spread operator vs apply - realistic
Compare the differing ways you can call a function with arbitrary arguments dynamically |
one year ago |
foreach vs mappp
Compare loop performance |
one year ago |
arr.at(-1) vs arr[arr.length-1]
Test access speed |
one year ago |
incl/set | one year ago |
JWT token Split vs Basic string replace | one year ago |
Test class map parsing | one year ago |
Date.parse vs new Date() | one year ago |
Umbrella JS vs Jquery latest | one year ago |
Large but empty Array versus Small Object (Access wise with string versus sorted number) | one year ago |
endsWith() vs Ordinary For loop | one year ago |
werwerwe | one year ago |
append vs appendChild multiiple | one year ago |
werwer | one year ago |
1asdsadas
21 |
one year ago |
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for eac2!1! | one year ago |
forEach vs reduce vs map vs filter vs for eac2! | one year ago |
arr.find vs arr.some
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method |
one year ago |
aisdbjkakdvjkahds kjahsdv
Test on deep equality performance |
one year ago |
array[index] vs array.at(index) | one year ago |
frozen VS unfrozen object iteration times | one year ago |
Fastest way to check if object is empty with 3 types of checks with big amount of data
You don't need to make add for loops in your test scenarios, the benchmark does it itself. |
one year ago |
new-date-vs-date-settime-fixed2 | one year ago |
new-date-vs-date-settime-fixed | one year ago |
`filter().length` vs. `reduce` vs. `for` fork
Compare `filter().length` vs `reduce` vs `for` loop by counting element that satisfy condition. Forked from https://www.measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/22294/0/filterlength-vs-reduce-vs-for |
one year ago |
i hate l00ps with optimaze for and with function | one year ago |