Benchmark: Umbrella JS vs Jquery latest

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.7.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/umbrellajs"></script>
<div id="test">Test</div>

Tests:

Jquery Selector
var test = $("#test")
Umbrella Selector
var test = u("#test")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Jquery Selector
Umbrella Selector

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Jquery Selector	9511233.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector	1728399.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark hosted on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares the performance of two popular lightweight JavaScript libraries, jQuery (version 3.7.1) and UmbrellaJS (latest version).

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared in this benchmark:

1. **jQuery Selector**: This option uses the `$` symbol to select an element in the DOM. Specifically, the test case `var test = $(\"#test\")` creates a jQuery object that represents the HTML element with the id "test".
2. **Umbrella Selector**: This option uses the `u()` function to select an element in the DOM. Specifically, the test case `var test = u(\"#test\")` creates an UmbrellaJS object that represents the HTML element with the id "test".

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **jQuery Selector**:
	+ Pros: jQuery is a well-established and widely supported library, making it easy to integrate into projects. It also provides a lot of useful features out of the box.
	+ Cons: jQuery is not as lightweight as UmbrellaJS, which can impact performance in certain scenarios.
* **Umbrella Selector**:
	+ Pros: UmbrellaJS is designed to be very lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for applications that require fast DOM manipulation. It also provides a simple and easy-to-use API.
	+ Cons: UmbrellaJS is still a relatively new library, and its ecosystem may not be as mature as jQuery's.

**Library Purposes**

* **jQuery**: jQuery is a general-purpose JavaScript library that aims to simplify DOM manipulation and provide a convenient way to interact with the Document Object Model (DOM). It provides a wide range of features, including DOM selection, event handling, and AJAX support.
* **UmbrellaJS**: UmbrellaJS is a lightweight JavaScript library designed specifically for fast and efficient DOM manipulation. Its API is simple and easy to use, making it suitable for applications that require rapid DOM updates.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

In this benchmark, the test cases use a special feature called "asynchronous code" (i.e., the `u()` function returns immediately without blocking the execution of the code). This allows the test cases to run multiple times in parallel, which can help measure performance under load.

I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.

Related benchmarks:

Umbrella JS vs Jquery latest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Jquery Selector vs Umbrella Selector

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Jquery Selector

Umbrella Selector

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):