Benchmark: Umbrella JS vs Jquery

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.7.0/umbrella.min.js"></script>
<div id="test">Test</div>

Tests:

Jquery Selector
var test = $("#test")
Umbrella Selector
var test = u("#test")

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 12 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 12 runs

Jquery Selector

4.1M/s

Umbrella Selector

1.2M/s

Fastest: Jquery Selector (3.3x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Jquery Selector: 4,118,403 ops/sec
• Umbrella Selector: 1,247,528 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Jquery Selector
Umbrella Selector

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 14; Mobile; rv:134.0) Gecko/134.0 Firefox/134.0

Browser/OS: Firefox Mobile 134 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Jquery Selector

1.7M/s

Umbrella Selector

174K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Jquery Selector	1,665,837 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector	173,829 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

MeasureThat.net provides a JSON object that represents the benchmark, which includes:

* `Name`: The name of the benchmark (e.g., "Umbrella JS vs Jquery")
* `Description` and `Script Preparation Code`: These are empty in this case, but they can be used to provide additional context and setup code for the benchmark.
* `Html Preparation Code`: This is a string that represents the HTML code used to prepare the test environment. In this case, it includes links to jQuery and Umbrella libraries, as well as a simple `<div>` element with an ID of "test".

**Test Cases**

The benchmark defines two individual test cases:

1. **Jquery Selector**: The benchmark definition is `var test = $(\"#test\")`, which uses the jQuery library to select an HTML element with the ID "test".
2. **Umbrella Selector**: The benchmark definition is `var test = u(\"#test\")`, which uses the Umbrella library to select an HTML element with the ID "test".

**Options Compared**

In this benchmark, two options are compared:

* **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that provides a powerful DOM manipulation API.
* **Umbrella**: A lightweight alternative to jQuery, designed to be faster and more efficient.

The pros and cons of these approaches are:

**jQuery:**

Pros:

* Well-established and widely-used library with a large community of developers
* Provides a robust set of DOM manipulation APIs
* Has built-in support for many features, such as event handling and animation

Cons:

* Can be slower than Umbrella due to its larger size and more complex implementation
* May require additional setup and configuration for certain use cases

**Umbrella:**

Pros:

* Designed to be faster and more efficient than jQuery, with a smaller size and simpler implementation
* Provides a similar set of DOM manipulation APIs as jQuery
* Can be easier to optimize and customize for specific use cases

Cons:

* May not have the same level of support or community behind it as jQuery
* Can be less well-known among developers, which may affect its adoption rate

**Library:**

Both jQuery and Umbrella are designed to work with HTML elements, but they use different approaches to achieve this. jQuery uses a CSS-like selector syntax (`$(\"#test\")`), while Umbrella uses a more traditional JavaScript-style selector (`u(\"#test\")`). Both libraries provide APIs for working with selected elements, such as accessing their properties and methods.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax:**

In this benchmark, there is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested. The focus is on the performance comparison between jQuery and Umbrella in terms of DOM manipulation.

**Alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternatives to jQuery or Umbrella, some popular options include:

* **Lodash**: A utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with data, including array manipulation and string manipulation.
* **Underscore.js**: Another utility library that provides a set of functional programming helpers for working with data.
* **Vue.js** and **React.js**: Two popular front-end frameworks that provide their own DOM manipulation APIs and can be used as alternatives to jQuery or Umbrella.

In terms of lightweight alternatives to jQuery, you may also consider:

* **VanillaJS**: A minimalist JavaScript library that provides a subset of the functionality available in jQuery.
* **Slim** : A small JavaScript library that aims to provide the most essential functionality for DOM manipulation.

Umbrella JS vs Jquery (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `Jquery Selector vs Umbrella Selector`

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Jquery Selector

Umbrella Selector

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 12 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 12 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Umbrella JS vs Jquery (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Jquery Selector vs Umbrella Selector

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

Jquery Selector

Umbrella Selector

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 12 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 12 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Jquery Selector vs Umbrella Selector`