Browse the latest JavaScript performance benchmarks created by the community.
What's the fastest way to process a list of vectors? Do you go the OO route, with an array of Vector() objects? Do you create a new data structure, using Float32Arrays for x, y, and z? Do you create a single Float32Array and interlace values for x, y, and z within it? Let's find out!
What's the fastest way to process a list of vectors? Do you go the OO route, with an array of Vector() objects? Do you create a new data structure, using Float32Arrays for x, y, and z? Do you create a single Float32Array and interlace values for x, y, and z within it? Let's find out!
No description provided
What's the fastest way to process a list of vectors? Do you go the OO route, with an array of Vector() objects? Do you create a new data structure, using Float32Arrays for x, y, and z? Let's find out!
What's the fastest way to process a list of vectors? Do you go the OO route, with an array of Vector() objects? Do you create a new data structure, using Float32Arrays for x, y, and z? Do you create a single Float32Array and interlace values for x, y, and z within it? Let's find out!
Bitwise operators are slow in javascript because there is implicit type conversion between floats and ints. If we use TypedArrays though, javascript engines shouldn't have to convert. But do they? This test is here to find out. We'll also check to see whether conversion is performed between another int-like datatypes, Uint32
jhg
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
Test various styles of retrieving the content of a <template> element using jQuery and pure JavaScript
blah
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided