Benchmark: Query Selector v Sizzle

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>

<div id="test" class="m">a</div>
<div class="m">b</div>

Script Preparation code:

var select = function(selector) {
	if (!selector) return null
	
	if (selector.charAt(0) == '#') {
		return document.querySelector(selector)
	} else {
		var result = document.querySelectorAll(selector)
		switch (result.length) {
			case 0:
				return null
			case 1:
				return result[0]
			default:
				return result
		}
	}
}

Tests:

qs ID
select('#test')
qs Class
select('.m')
sizzle ID
$('#test')
sizzle Class
$('.m')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
qs ID
qs Class
sizzle ID
sizzle Class

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.0 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

qs Class

19.4M/s

qs ID

12.7M/s

sizzle ID

9.2M/s

sizzle Class

4.9M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ qs Class	19,425,170 Ops/sec
qs ID	12,746,743 Ops/sec
sizzle ID	9,218,926 Ops/sec
sizzle Class	4,863,678 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case for measuring the performance of two different selector libraries: Sizzle and jQuery.

**Selector Libraries:**

1. **Sizzle**: Sizzle is a lightweight CSS selector library that provides a fast and efficient way to select elements in the DOM. It's designed to be faster than jQuery selectors, but it requires more manual effort to write.
2. **jQuery**: jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a simple and easy-to-use API for selecting elements in the DOM. While it's generally slower than Sizzle, it's often preferred due to its ease of use.

**Options Compared:**

The benchmark compares the performance of two options:

1. **Sizzle** (using the `select()` function): This option uses the `select()` function from the Sizzle library to select elements.
2. **jQuery** (using the `$()` function): This option uses the `$()` function from jQuery to select elements.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Sizzle**:
	+ Pros:
		- Faster performance
		- More control over the selection process
	+ Cons:
		- Requires more manual effort to write selectors
		- Less intuitive API than jQuery
* **jQuery**:
	+ Pros:
		- Easier to use and learn
		- More intuitive API
	+ Cons:
		- Slower performance compared to Sizzle

**Library Purpose:**

The `select()` function from Sizzle is designed to provide a fast and efficient way to select elements in the DOM. It takes a CSS selector as an argument and returns the first matching element, or an array of matching elements if multiple matches are found.

In contrast, jQuery's `$()` function provides a more general-purpose API for selecting elements, including the ability to chain multiple selectors together using the `>`, `+`, and `~` operators. This makes it easier to select multiple elements at once, but can also lead to slower performance due to the overhead of parsing the selector.

**Special JS Features/Syntax:**

In this benchmark, no special JavaScript features or syntax are used beyond the standard CSS selectors. However, if you were to use advanced techniques like `querySelectorAll()` with the `[attribute]` syntax, it could potentially affect the performance results.

**Other Alternatives:**

If you're interested in exploring other selector libraries, some alternatives to Sizzle and jQuery include:

* **CSSOM** (CSS Object Model): A W3C standard for accessing CSS stylesheets and selectors.
* **VanillaJS**: A JavaScript library that provides a lightweight and fast way to select elements using CSS selectors.
* **Babel** or other transpilers: Can help optimize performance by compiling modern JavaScript code to older versions that are supported by various browsers.

Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and may not perform as well as Sizzle or jQuery in all cases.

Query Selector v Sizzle (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `qs ID vs qs Class vs sizzle ID vs sizzle Class`

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

qs ID

qs Class

sizzle ID

sizzle Class

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Query Selector v Sizzle (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: qs ID vs qs Class vs sizzle ID vs sizzle Class

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

qs ID

qs Class

sizzle ID

sizzle Class

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `qs ID vs qs Class vs sizzle ID vs sizzle Class`