Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
JSON Query Languages
JMESPath vs JSONata vs JSPath vs JSONPath
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=627912" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/146.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 146
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
5 months ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
JSPath
18.1M/s
JMESPath
1.1M/s
JSONPath
95K/s
JSONata
51K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
JSPath
18,081,208 Ops/sec
JMESPath
1,148,269 Ops/sec
JSONPath
95,162 Ops/sec
JSONata
51,487 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonata/jsonata.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jmespath/jmespath.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jspath/jspath.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonpath"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var testData = {"a": {"b": {"c": {"d": "value"}}}}
Tests:
JMESPath
var jmespathResult = jmespath.search(testData, 'a.b.c.d')
JSONata
var jsonataResult = jsonata('a.b.c.d').evaluate(testData)
JSPath
var jsPathResult = JSPath.apply('.a.b.c.d', testData)
JSONPath
var jsPathResult = jsonpath.query(testData, '$.a.b.c.d')