Benchmark: JSON Query Languages

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonata/jsonata.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jmespath/jmespath.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jspath/jspath.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonpath"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var testData = {"a": {"b": {"c": {"d": "value"}}}}

Tests:

JMESPath
var jmespathResult = jmespath.search(testData, 'a.b.c.d')
JSONata
var jsonataResult = jsonata('a.b.c.d').evaluate(testData)
JSPath
var jsPathResult = JSPath.apply('.a.b.c.d', testData)
JSONPath
var jsPathResult = jsonpath.query(testData, '$.a.b.c.d')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JMESPath
JSONata
JSPath
JSONPath

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/149.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
JMESPath	1228849.8 Ops/sec
JSONata	65651.1 Ops/sec
JSPath	20949638.0 Ops/sec
JSONPath	146424.7 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JSON query languages is an essential task, especially with the growing amount of data being stored and processed in various applications.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark compares four popular JavaScript libraries for querying JSON data: JMESPath (JMESPath), JSONata, JSPath (JSPATH), and JSONPath. Each library is tested for its execution speed when used to query a predefined test dataset.

**Options Compared**

The options being compared are:

1. **JMESPath**: Uses a syntax inspired by XPath expressions to query JSON data.
2. **JSONata**: Offers a unique, functional programming-inspired language for querying JSON data.
3. **JSPath (JSPATH)**: Provides a lightweight and efficient way to query JSON data using a simple, dot-based notation.
4. **JSONPath**: Implements the standard JSON Path specification for querying JSON data.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here's a brief overview of each library's strengths and weaknesses:

1. **JMESPath**:
	* Pros: Easy to learn and use, widely adopted, and supports many features (e.g., variables, functions).
	* Cons: Can be slower than other libraries for simple queries.
2. **JSONata**:
	* Pros: Offers a unique, functional programming-inspired syntax that can lead to more concise code.
	* Cons: May require additional learning time due to its proprietary syntax.
3. **JSPath (JSPATH)**:
	* Pros: Extremely lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
	* Cons: Limited features compared to other libraries.
4. **JSONPath**:
	* Pros: Standardized specification ensures compatibility across implementations.
	* Cons: May not be as efficient or user-friendly as other libraries.

**Library Descriptions**

Here are brief descriptions of the mentioned libraries:

1. **JMESPath**: A JavaScript implementation of the JMESPath query language, which is inspired by XPath expressions. It's widely used and supports many features, making it a popular choice for querying JSON data.
2. **JSONata**: A proprietary query language that offers a functional programming-inspired syntax. It's designed to be concise and efficient, but its unique syntax may require additional learning time.
3. **JSPath (JSPATH)**: A lightweight JavaScript library that provides an efficient way to query JSON data using a simple dot-based notation. Its minimalistic approach makes it suitable for large-scale applications.

**Special Features or Syntax**

The benchmark doesn't explicitly mention any special features or syntax, but we can assume that each library has its own strengths and weaknesses:

* **JMESPath**: Supports variables, functions, and other advanced features.
* **JSONata**: Offers a functional programming-inspired syntax with concise code generation.
* **JSPath (JSPATH)**: Provides an efficient, lightweight implementation with no additional features.
* **JSONPath**: Implements the standard JSON Path specification.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative JavaScript libraries for querying JSON data, consider:

1. **XPath.js**: A JavaScript implementation of the XPath 1.0 specification.
2. **Query.js**: A lightweight library that provides a flexible and efficient way to query JSON data using a simple syntax.

In conclusion, each library has its strengths and weaknesses, making it essential to evaluate their performance and features when choosing a suitable library for your specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

JSON Query Languages (version: 0)

JMESPath vs JSONata vs JSPath vs JSONPath

Comparing performance of: JMESPath vs JSONata vs JSPath vs JSONPath

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JMESPath

JSONata

JSPath

JSONPath

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):