Run results for: createElement direct V.S. createElement('template') and cloneNode

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/143.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 143

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 7 months ago

createElement direct

265K/s

createElement with template and cloneNode

244K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ createElement direct	264,870 Ops/sec
createElement with template and cloneNode	244,136 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

const contextDirect = '<h1>Hello World</h1><p>Static content</p>'
const contentWithClone = '<div id="static"><h1>Hello World</h1><p>Static content</p></div>'

// 按vue-vapor复用template dom
var t;

Tests:

createElement direct
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.id = 'static'; div.innerHTML = contextDirect;
createElement with template and cloneNode
t = t || document.createElement('template'); t.innerHTML = contentWithClone; const result = t.content.firstChild.cloneNode(true)