Benchmark: createElement direct V.S. createElement('template') and cloneNode

Script Preparation code:

const contextDirect = '<h1>Hello World</h1><p>Static content</p>'
const contentWithClone = '<div id="static"><h1>Hello World</h1><p>Static content</p></div>'

// 按vue-vapor复用template dom
var t;

Tests:

createElement direct
const div = document.createElement('div'); div.id = 'static'; div.innerHTML = contextDirect;
createElement with template and cloneNode
t = t || document.createElement('template'); t.innerHTML = contentWithClone; const result = t.content.firstChild.cloneNode(true)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
createElement direct
createElement with template and cloneNode

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/143.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 143 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
createElement direct	263833.0 Ops/sec
createElement with template and cloneNode	244090.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

createElement direct V.S. createElement('template') and cloneNode (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: createElement direct vs createElement with template and cloneNode

Created: 4 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

createElement direct

createElement with template and cloneNode

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A