Benchmark: cloneNode(true) vs innerHMTL - w/ Destroy DOM

Script Preparation code:

var str = `<div>${Math.random().toString().slice(2)}</div>`;
var temp = document.createElement('template')
var res = '';
for(i=0; i<30000; i++){
	res += str
}
temp.innerHTML = res;

var div = document.createElement('div')
div.innerHTML = res;

Tests:

cloneNode(true)
div.innerHTML = res; div.append(temp.content.cloneNode(true));
innerHTML
div.innerHTML = res;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
cloneNode(true)
innerHTML

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.6 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 18 on iOS 18.6

View result in a separate tab

innerHTML

123/s

cloneNode(true)

68/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ innerHTML	123 Ops/sec
cloneNode(true)	68 Ops/sec

cloneNode(true) vs innerHMTL - w/ Destroy DOM (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `cloneNode(true) vs innerHTML`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

cloneNode(true)

innerHTML

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

cloneNode(true) vs innerHMTL - w/ Destroy DOM (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: cloneNode(true) vs innerHTML

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

cloneNode(true)

innerHTML

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `cloneNode(true) vs innerHTML`