Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
variadics vs arrays
testing wheter variadic params in functions are faster or slower than simply passing arrays as arguments
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=614648" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/138.0.0.0
Browser:
Chrome 138
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
array
15.6M/s
variadic
14.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
array
15,555,564 Ops/sec
variadic
14,821,838 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
variadic
function test(...args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z');
array
function test(args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z']);