Benchmark: variadics vs arrays

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

variadic
function test(...args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z');
array
function test(args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z']);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
variadic
array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 147 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
variadic	7255743.5 Ops/sec
array	6704257.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

variadics vs arrays (version: 1)

testing wheter variadic params in functions are faster or slower than simply passing arrays as arguments

Comparing performance of: variadic vs array

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

variadic

array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A