Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
JSON Query Languages
JMESPath vs JSONata vs JSPath vs JSONPath
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=603152" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0
Browser:
Firefox 138
Operating system:
Mac OS X 10.15
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
one year ago
Benchmark engine:
Benchmark.js
JSPath
17.2M/s
JMESPath
1.2M/s
JSONPath
162K/s
JSONata
64K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
JSPath
17,233,456 Ops/sec
JMESPath
1,194,818 Ops/sec
JSONPath
162,125 Ops/sec
JSONata
64,189 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonata/jsonata.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jmespath/jmespath.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jspath/jspath.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/jsonpath"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var testData = {"a": {"b": {"c": {"d": "value"}}}}
Tests:
JMESPath
var jmespathResult = jmespath.search(testData, 'a.b.c.d')
JSONata
var jsonataResult = jsonata('a.b.c.d').evaluate(testData)
JSPath
var jsPathResult = JSPath.apply('.a.b.c.d', testData)
JSONPath
var jsPathResult = jsonpath.query(testData, '$.a.b.c.d')