Run results for: Ramda vs FxTS

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser: Firefox 136

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda with currying and composition	1211.8 Ops/sec
FxTS	446681.7 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@fxts/core/dist/fx.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = _.toArray(_.range(10000)).map(function(i) {
  return {
    counter: i
  }
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

function square(num) {
  return num * num;
}

function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
  return num.toString().length < 3;
}

Tests:

Ramda with currying and composition
var result = R.pipe( R.pluck('counter'), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits), R.take(3) )(data);
FxTS
var result = _.pipe( data, _.pluck('counter'), _.filter(isOdd), _.map(square), _.filter(lessThanThreeDigits), _.take(3), _.toArray );

Run results for: Ramda vs FxTS

This is a benchmark for describing lazy evaluation.

Ramda with currying and composition

FxTS