Benchmark: Ramda vs FxTS - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@fxts/core/dist/fx.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = _.toArray(_.range(10000)).map(function(i) {
  return {
    counter: i
  }
});

function isOdd(num) {
  return num % 2 === 1;
}

function square(num) {
  return num * num;
}

function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
  return num.toString().length < 3;
}

Tests:

Ramda with currying and composition
var result = R.pipe( R.pluck('counter'), R.filter(isOdd), R.map(square), R.filter(lessThanThreeDigits), R.take(3) )(data);
FxTS
var result = _.pipe( data, _.pluck('counter'), _.filter(isOdd), _.map(square), _.filter(lessThanThreeDigits), _.take(3), _.toArray );

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda with currying and composition
FxTS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 136 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda with currying and composition	1211.8 Ops/sec
FxTS	446681.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Ramda vs FxTS (version: 0)

This is a benchmark for describing lazy evaluation.

Comparing performance of: Ramda with currying and composition vs FxTS

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Ramda with currying and composition

FxTS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A