Run results for: Set.has vs Array.includes for small number of items Bv2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 132

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: one year ago

array_1

111.7M/s

set_1

103.4M/s

array_8

94.9M/s

set_8

90.6M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ array_1	111,677,096 Ops/sec
set_1	103,426,296 Ops/sec
array_8	94,897,240 Ops/sec
set_8	90,601,432 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const array_1 = new Array(1).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_1 = new Set(array_1);
const item_1 = array_1[0];

const array_2 = new Array(1, 2).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_2 = new Set(array_2);
const item_2 = array_2[1];

const array_4 = new Array(1, 2, 3, 4).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_4 = new Set(array_4);
const item_4 = array_2[3];

const array_8 = new Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_8 = new Set(array_8);
const item_8 = array_2[7];

Tests:

array_1
array_1.includes(item_1)
set_1
set_1.has(item_1)
array_8
array_8.includes(item_8)
set_8
set_8.has(item_8)