Benchmark: Set.has vs Array.includes for small number of items Bv2

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const array_1 = new Array(1).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_1 = new Set(array_1);
const item_1 = array_1[0];

const array_2 = new Array(1, 2).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_2 = new Set(array_2);
const item_2 = array_2[1];

const array_4 = new Array(1, 2, 3, 4).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_4 = new Set(array_4);
const item_4 = array_2[3];

const array_8 = new Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).map((_, i) => self.crypto.randomUUID()
);
const set_8 = new Set(array_8);
const item_8 = array_2[7];

Tests:

array_1
array_1.includes(item_1)
set_1
set_1.has(item_1)
array_8
array_8.includes(item_8)
set_8
set_8.has(item_8)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array_1
set_1
array_8
set_8

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 132 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array_1	111677096.0 Ops/sec
set_1	103426296.0 Ops/sec
array_8	94897240.0 Ops/sec
set_8	90601432.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Set.has vs Array.includes for small number of items Bv2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array_1 vs set_1 vs array_8 vs set_8

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array_1

set_1

array_8

set_8

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A