Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Run results for:
set.has vs. array.includes vs. map.has
Go to the benchmark
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Run details:
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.6.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser:
Yandex Browser 24
Operating system:
Windows
Device Platform:
Desktop
Date tested:
2 years ago
Map.has
26.7M/s
Set.has
26.4M/s
Array.includes
173K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Map.has
26,716,736 Ops/sec
Set.has
26,413,580 Ops/sec
Array.includes
173,368 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [...Array.from(Array(100000).keys())]; var set = new Set(arr) var map = new Map(arr.map(k => [k, undefined]))
Tests:
Array.includes
return arr.includes(99999)
Set.has
return set.has(99999)
Map.has
return map.has(99999)