Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
set.has vs. array.includes vs. map.has
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.includes vs Set.has vs Map.has
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [...Array.from(Array(100000).keys())]; var set = new Set(arr) var map = new Map(arr.map(k => [k, undefined]))
Tests:
Array.includes
return arr.includes(99999)
Set.has
return set.has(99999)
Map.has
return map.has(99999)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.includes
Set.has
Map.has
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.6.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Yandex Browser 24 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=532736" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Array.includes
173368.4 Ops/sec
Set.has
26413580.0 Ops/sec
Map.has
26716736.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
set.has vs. array.includes 2
Map has vs get
has vs includes
Array.includes vs Set.has vas Map.has 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?