Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
set.has vs. array.includes vs. map.has
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.includes vs Set.has vs Map.has
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [...Array.from(Array(100000).keys())]; var set = new Set(arr) var map = new Map(arr.map(k => [k, undefined]))
Tests:
Array.includes
return arr.includes(99999)
Set.has
return set.has(99999)
Map.has
return map.has(99999)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.includes
Set.has
Map.has
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 YaBrowser/24.6.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Yandex Browser 24 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=532736" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Map.has
26.7M/s
Set.has
26.4M/s
Array.includes
173K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Map.has
26,716,736 Ops/sec
Set.has
26,413,580 Ops/sec
Array.includes
173,368 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
Map has vs get
has vs includes
Array.includes vs Set.has vas Map.has 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?