Run results for: Rambda vs. Lodash equality

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:127.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/127.0

Browser: Firefox 127

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 2 years ago

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

1.2M/s

Lodash

829K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Ramda without relying on currying or composition	1,220,847 Ops/sec
Lodash	828,834 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/rambda@9.2.1/dist/rambda.umd.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

// intial data
var source = {a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:{a:-1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1}};
var source2 = {a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:{a:-1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1}};

Tests:

Lodash
var result = _.isEqual(source, source2);
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.equals(source, source2);

Run results for: Rambda vs. Lodash equality

Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs Ramda vs Fastest Clone.

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition