Benchmark: Rambda vs. Lodash equality

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/rambda@9.2.1/dist/rambda.umd.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

// intial data
var source = {a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:{a:-1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1}};
var source2 = {a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:{a:-1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1}};

Tests:

Lodash
var result = _.isEqual(source, source2);
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.equals(source, source2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:127.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/127.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 127 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

1.2M/s

Lodash

829K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Ramda without relying on currying or composition	1,220,847 Ops/sec
Lodash	828,834 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and analyze what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two equality functions: Lodash's `isEqual` function and Ramda's `equals` function (without relying on currying or composition). The test case uses a predefined JSON data structure (`source`) to calculate the equality between identical and slightly modified versions of it (`source2`).

**Tested Options**

The benchmark tests two main options:

1. **Lodash Equality**: Lodash's `isEqual` function is used to compare the `source` and `source2` objects.
2. **Ramda Equality**: Ramda's `equals` function (without relying on currying or composition) is used to compare the `source` and `source2` objects.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Lodash Equality**: Lodash's `isEqual` function is a well-established and widely-used equality function. It has some advantages, such as:
	+ Wide support for various data structures (arrays, objects, etc.)
	+ Built-in handling of primitive types
	+ Easy to use and understand
However, it also has some potential drawbacks:
	+ May be slower than optimized implementations due to its higher-level abstraction
	+ Can lead to unnecessary computations if used with complex or deeply nested objects

* **Ramda Equality**: Ramda's `equals` function is a lightweight and efficient implementation of equality checking. It has some advantages, such as:
	+ Faster execution times compared to Lodash
	+ More tailored for functional programming use cases
	+ Fewer dependencies on external libraries
However, it also has some potential drawbacks:
	+ May be less intuitive or easier to learn for developers without prior experience with Ramda
	+ Less flexible handling of primitive types

**Library and Syntax**

* **Lodash**: Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for various tasks, including equality checking. The `isEqual` function in the benchmark uses the `lodash.isEqual` method.
* **Ramda**: Ramda is a lightweight functional programming library that provides an efficient implementation of equality checking through its `equals` function.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's typical for modern JavaScript code. It only uses standard ES6+ syntax and built-in libraries like Lodash and Ramda.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for equality checking in JavaScript include:

* **JavaScript's `===` operator**: While it can be used for simple cases, it may not cover all edge cases or work with certain data structures.
* **ES6's `Object.is()` method**: This method is available on modern browsers and provides a more precise comparison for objects.
* **Custom implementations**: Depending on the specific requirements, developers might choose to implement their own equality checking logic from scratch.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not offer the same level of performance or flexibility as optimized libraries like Lodash and Ramda.

Rambda vs. Lodash equality (version: 0)

Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs Ramda vs Fastest Clone.

Comparing performance of: `Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Rambda vs. Lodash equality (version: 0)

Compares performance on the same task using Lodash vs Ramda vs Fastest Clone.

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition`