Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
regex vs split/pop
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs Split and Join
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'gid://shopify/Product/1234567890'; var regex = /\d+$/
Tests:
Regex
regex.exec(str)[0]
Split and Join
str.split('/').pop()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
Split and Join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using regular expressions (regex) to extract a substring from a string, and using the `split()` method with array slicing (`pop()`) to achieve the same result. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Regex approach**: Using regex patterns to match and extract a substring from the input string. 2. **Split and Join approach**: Splitting the input string into an array using the `/` separator, and then accessing the last element of the array using `pop()`. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Regex approach** * Pros: + Can be more flexible and powerful for complex string manipulation tasks. + Can handle different data formats and formats with varying levels of nesting. * Cons: + Can be slower than other methods, especially for large strings or complex regex patterns. + Requires a good understanding of regex syntax and patterns to write effective code. 2. **Split and Join approach** * Pros: + Typically faster than regex approaches, as it's just array manipulation. + Easier to understand and implement, especially for simple string manipulation tasks. * Cons: + May not be suitable for complex string manipulation tasks or data formats with varying levels of nesting. **Library usage** In this benchmark, no external library is used. The `split()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that works with strings. **Special JS features/syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's focused on the performance comparison between two basic string manipulation approaches. **Alternative approaches** Other alternatives to consider for string manipulation tasks include: 1. **Using `substr()` or `substring()`**: These methods can be used to extract a substring from a string, but they may not offer the same level of flexibility as regex. 2. **Using `indexOf()` and concatenation**: This approach involves finding the index of the target substring using `indexOf()`, and then concatenating the surrounding substrings to form the desired result. The choice of approach depends on the specific use case, data format, and required performance characteristics. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
str.match vs str.split.pop
Regex vs Split and pop for capturing one section
regex vs split+pop
Regex vs Split and pop node name
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?