Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
regex vs split+pop
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx vs Split+Pop
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'arn:aws:evidently:us-east-1:111111:project/project/feature/newExperience';
Tests:
RegEx
str.match(/[^/]+$/)[0];
Split+Pop
str.split('/').pop();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx
Split+Pop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to extract the last part of a URL string: 1. **Regex**: Using regular expressions to match and extract the desired part of the URL. 2. **Split+Pop**: Splitting the URL into parts using the `/` character and then popping the last element from the resulting array. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Regex (using `str.match(/[^/]+$/)[0]`) * Split+Pop (using `str.split('/').pop()`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Regex:** Pros: * Can be flexible and powerful for pattern matching * Often used in web development for text processing Cons: * Can be slower than simple splitting methods due to the overhead of regex parsing * May require more memory allocation due to the complexity of regex patterns **Split+Pop:** Pros: * Fast and efficient, as it involves a simple string manipulation operation * Low memory allocation required, as it only needs to store the split result in an array Cons: * Limited to extracting the last part of a URL using `/` as the separator * May not handle edge cases or complex URL patterns well **Library Used** In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is used beyond the built-in `String.prototype.match()` and `Array.prototype.split()` methods. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript features like string manipulation, array methods, and regex patterns. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare different approaches for extracting the last part of a URL, some alternative options might include: * Using `URL` API to parse the URL: `var url = new URL(str); var lastPart = url.pathname.split('/').pop();` * Using a library like `urlsplit`: `const { URL } = require('urlsplit'); const url = URL(str); var lastPart = url.pathname.split('/').pop();` * Implementing custom parsing logic using JavaScript Keep in mind that each alternative approach would have its own pros and cons, depending on the specific requirements and constraints of your use case.
Related benchmarks:
regex vs split/pop
GetName
regex vs split+pop vs lastIndexOf+substring
Regex vs Split and pop node name
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?