Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy
(version: 0)
comparing native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy
Comparing performance of:
native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="lodash.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var users = [ { 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 } ]
Tests:
native sort of objects by localeCompare
users.sort((a,b) => a.user.localeCompare(b.user));
lodash _.orderBy
_.orderBy(users, 'user', 'asc')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
native sort of objects by localeCompare
lodash _.orderBy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its various components. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case. The benchmark compares two approaches for sorting objects by localeCompare: the native JavaScript method and the `lodash_.orderBy` function from the Lodash library. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Native sort of objects by localeCompare**: This approach uses the `localeCompare` method, which is a built-in JavaScript function that compares two strings based on their Unicode code points. 2. **Lodash _.orderBy**: This approach uses the `lodash_.orderBy` function from the Lodash library, which sorts an array of objects based on a specified key. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Native sort by localeCompare**: + Pros: Lightweight, no additional dependencies required. + Cons: May not work as expected for all locales or edge cases. * **Lodash _.orderBy**: + Pros: Robust, well-tested, and supports various sorting algorithms. + Cons: Adds an extra dependency (Lodash library) and may introduce performance overhead. **Library: Lodash** The `lodash_.orderBy` function is part of the Lodash library, a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functional programming helpers. The purpose of Lodash is to provide a set of reusable functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** Neither of the two approaches relies on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's available in standard JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative sorting libraries or approaches, here are a few options: 1. **Array.prototype.sort() with a custom compare function**: This approach allows you to define a custom compare function that can handle complex sorting scenarios. 2. ** Moment.js**: If your use case involves date-based sorting, Moment.js is a popular library that provides robust date manipulation and formatting capabilities. 3. **Underscore.js**: While not as widely used as Lodash, Underscore.js also provides various array manipulation functions, including `sort`. Keep in mind that the choice of sorting approach ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.sortBy
native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy swedish
native sort of objects by linus
a native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy
native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.sortBy []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?