Benchmark: native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy swedish

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'user': 'anders',  'age': 32 },
  { 'user': 'ängla',    'age': 41 },
  { 'user': 'åskar', 'age': 39 }
]

Tests:

native sort of objects by localeCompare
users.sort((a,b) => a.user.localeCompare(b.user, 'sv'));
lodash _.orderBy
_.orderBy(users, 'user', 'asc')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
native sort of objects by localeCompare
lodash _.orderBy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark is comparing two approaches to sorting objects by strings in a specific locale:

1. Native JavaScript `localeCompare()` method.
2. Lodash _.orderBy() function with a custom sorting order for Swedish locale.

**Options compared:**

* **Native JavaScript**: The built-in `localeCompare()` method, which is used to compare strings in a specific locale.
	+ Pros:
		- Fast and lightweight, as it's implemented in native code.
		- Provides accurate results for locale-specific comparisons.
	+ Cons:
		- May not be as flexible or customizable as other approaches.
* **Lodash _.orderBy()**: A popular utility library function that allows sorting arrays of objects by a specific property.
	+ Pros:
		- Highly customizable and flexible, with support for various sorting algorithms and locale options.
		- Can handle complex data structures and edge cases.

**Library:**

The benchmark uses Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library. In this case, it's using the _.orderBy() function to sort an array of objects by the "user" property in Swedish locale.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

None mentioned explicitly, but note that the `localeCompare()` method and the `.orderBy()` function both rely on the browser's Intl API for internationalization and localization. This means that the benchmark assumes the browser supports these features.

**Considerations:**

When choosing between native JavaScript `localeCompare()` and Lodash _.orderBy(), consider the trade-offs:

* If you need a lightweight, fast solution with good locale-specific results, use native JavaScript.
* If you require more flexibility, customization, or support for complex data structures, use Lodash _.orderBy().

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives to Lodash _.orderBy() include:

1. **Array.prototype.sort()**: A built-in method that can be used to sort arrays of objects by a specific property. However, this method may not provide the same level of customization as _.orderBy().
2. **Moment.js**: A popular library for working with dates and times. It includes a sorting function that can be used with Lodash or other libraries.
3. **Other libraries**: There are many other JavaScript libraries that offer similar functionality to _.orderBy(), such as Underscore.js, Ramda, or Lisk.

Keep in mind that the choice of library ultimately depends on your specific requirements and preferences.

Related benchmarks:

native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy swedish (version: 0)

comparing native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy

Comparing performance of: native sort of objects by localeCompare vs lodash _.orderBy

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

native sort of objects by localeCompare

lodash _.orderBy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):