Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance (empty object)

Tests:

Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...secondObject };
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the provided JSON benchmark data.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark test compares the performance of two ways to merge objects in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()`. The test creates two small objects, `firstObject` and `secondObject`, each with a single property containing a string value. It then creates a third object, `finalObject`, by merging these two objects using either the spread operator or `Object.assign()`.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the following options:

1. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**: This method was introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018) as part of the object rest and spread syntax. It allows you to create a new object by taking the properties from an existing object and spreading them into a new object using the `...` operator.
2. **Using `Object.assign()`**: This method is used to merge one or more source objects into a target object.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**:
	* Pros: More concise, expressive, and readable code. It can also be faster for small objects.
	* Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., merging multiple objects with overlapping properties). Also, it may incur additional overhead due to the creation of intermediate objects.
2. **Using `Object.assign()`**:
	* Pros: More familiar and widely supported by older browsers and environments. It also provides more control over the merging process (e.g., specifying a target object and optional options).
	* Cons: Can result in less concise code, making it harder to read and understand.

**Library usage**

There is no library explicitly mentioned in this benchmark test. However, `Object.assign()` relies on the browser's built-in `Object.prototype.assign()` method or its implementation in other libraries.

**Special JS features or syntax**

The spread operator (`...`) is a special feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It allows you to create new objects by spreading properties from existing objects. This feature is supported by most modern JavaScript engines and browsers.

**Alternative approaches**

Other alternatives for merging objects include:

1. **Using the `Object.assign()` method with multiple arguments**: Instead of using the spread operator, you can pass multiple objects as separate arguments to `Object.assign()`.
2. **Using a library like Lodash's `merge()` function**: If you need more control over the merging process or want to support older browsers, you can use a library like Lodash, which provides a robust and flexible way to merge objects.
3. **Using a custom implementation**: You can also implement your own custom solution for merging objects, which might provide better performance or specific requirements not met by existing libraries or methods.

In summary, the benchmark test compares the performance of two popular ways to merge objects in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and `Object.assign()`. While both approaches have their pros and cons, the spread operator offers a more concise and expressive way to merge objects, but may incur additional overhead.

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance (empty object) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):