Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance test number 99

Script Preparation code:

var firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }

Tests:

Using the spread operator
firstObject.moreData = 'foo bar' firstObject = {...firstObject}
Using Object.assign
const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, { moreData: 'foo bar' });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches for assigning new properties to an object:

1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a shallow copy of the original object and then updates its `moreData` property.
2. **`Object.assign()`**: This method creates a new object by copying all enumerable own properties from the source objects (in this case, the original `firstObject`).

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares two options:

* Using the spread operator (`...`) to assign new properties to an object
* Using the `Object.assign()` method to create a new object and then assigning properties to it

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ More concise and readable code.
		+ Can be faster since it only creates a shallow copy of the original object.
	* Cons:
		+ May not work as expected if the original object contains nested objects or arrays, which are not copied by the spread operator.
2. **`Object.assign()`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Works with any type of object, including nested objects and arrays.
		+ Can be more explicit about creating a new object.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires more code to achieve the same result as the spread operator.

**Library Usage**

There is no external library used in this benchmark. The JavaScript core functionality is being tested.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`), which is a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It's not essential to know how to use it, but understanding its basics can be helpful for creating similar code in the future.

**Other Considerations**

When writing JavaScript performance benchmarks like this one, consider the following:

* Use simple, concise code snippets to minimize overhead.
* Ensure that the benchmark is representative of real-world scenarios or edge cases.
* Run multiple iterations and collect statistics to get an accurate measure of performance.
* Be aware of potential sources of variance in your results, such as browser versions, hardware configurations, or network connections.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for assigning new properties to an object include:

* Using the `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call()` method to check if a property already exists before assigning it.
* Creating a new object using the `Object.create()` method and then updating its properties.
* Using a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provides more advanced functional programming utilities.

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance test number 99 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):