Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Adding fields to functions
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
fun-assign vs no-assign-named vs object-assign vs define-prop
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
fun-assign
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function(j) { return j; }; f.name = "f"; sum += f(i); } console.log(f.name);
no-assign-named
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function f(j) { return j; }; sum += f(i); } console.log(f.name);
object-assign
var f; var sum = 0; var o = {}; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function f(j) { return j; }; o.name = "f"; sum += f(i); } console.log(f.name);
define-prop
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function(j) { return j; }; Object.defineProperty(f, 'name', {value: 'f'}); sum += f(i); } console.log(f.name);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
fun-assign
no-assign-named
object-assign
define-prop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring performance in JavaScript is crucial, and measuring that performance in microbenchmarks like MeasureThat.net helps to understand the optimization opportunities. **Benchmark Description** The provided benchmark measures how fast it is to assign a property name to a function using different methods: 1. **Direct Assignment**: `f.name = "f";` - This method assigns the property name directly to the function. 2. **Object Assignment**: `o.name = "f";` - Similar to direct assignment, but uses an object (`o`) as a proxy. 3. **Property Definition**: `Object.defineProperty(f, 'name', {value: 'f'})` - This method uses the `Object.defineProperty()` function to define a property on the function. **Options Comparison** The benchmark compares these three approaches: * **Pros and Cons:** * **Direct Assignment (fun-assign)**: * Pros: * Simple, intuitive syntax. * Fast execution time. * Cons: * May not be supported in older JavaScript engines or browsers. * Can lead to naming conflicts if multiple functions have the same name. * **Object Assignment (object-assign)**: * Pros: * More flexible than direct assignment, as it uses an object as a proxy. * Can be used to avoid naming conflicts. * Cons: * Requires creating and using an extra object, which can add overhead. * **Property Definition (define-prop)**: * Pros: * More explicit and flexible than direct assignment or object assignment. * Allows for more fine-grained control over property definitions. * Cons: * Requires knowledge of the `Object.defineProperty()` function, which can be a barrier to adoption. **Library Usage** In the benchmark, none of the libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may use libraries or frameworks under the hood to optimize performance. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you want to explore other approaches to measuring performance in JavaScript: * **Use built-in `Date.now()`**: Measure execution time using `Date.now()` as a reference point. * **Profile your code with the Chrome DevTools Profiler**: Analyze your code's execution flow and identify performance bottlenecks. * **Consider using WebAssembly (WASM) for performance-critical sections**: If you're developing high-performance applications, WASM might be an attractive option. Keep in mind that these alternatives may require more setup or expertise than running a benchmark on MeasureThat.net.
Related benchmarks:
Adding fields to functions
Adding fields to functions
Adding fields to functions
Adding fields to functions
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?