Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Adding fields to functions
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
fun-assign vs no-assign-named vs object-assign vs define-prop vs fun-assign mangled
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function unmangle(s) { return s.replace(/\$\d+$/, "").replace("$_", "-"); }
Tests:
fun-assign
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function(j) { return j; }; f.name = "fun-name"; sum += f(i); } console.log(unmangle(f.name));
no-assign-named
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function fun$_name$2(j) { return j; }; sum += f(i); } console.log(unmangle(f.name));
object-assign
var f; var sum = 0; var o = {}; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function f(j) { return j; }; o.name = "un$_name$3"; sum += f(i); } console.log(unmangle(f.name + o.name));
define-prop
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function(j) { return j; }; Object.defineProperty(f, 'name', {value: 'fun-name'}); sum += f(i); } console.log(f.name);
fun-assign mangled
var f; var sum = 0; for(var i = 0; i <= 100000; i += 1) { f = function(j) { return j; }; f.name = "fun$_name$1"; sum += f(i); } console.log(unmangle(f.name));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
fun-assign
no-assign-named
object-assign
define-prop
fun-assign mangled
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark measures how fast JavaScript functions can be assigned and used in different ways, which is relevant for understanding performance optimization techniques, especially when it comes to code readability, maintainability, and execution speed. **Options Compared:** Four options are compared: 1. **Assignment without naming**: `f = function(j) { return j; }` 2. **Assignment with named object**: `var o = {}; f = function f(j) { return j; } o.name = "un$_name$3";` 3. **Property definition using Object.defineProperty**: `Object.defineProperty(f, 'name', {value: 'fun-name'})` 4. **Mangled assignment**: `f = function fun$_name$2(j) { return j; }` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Assignment without naming**: This approach is simple and fast but also less readable and maintainable, as the variable name is not defined until after it's used. * Pros: Fast execution speed * Cons: Less readable, maintainable, and less debuggable 2. **Assignment with named object**: This approach uses a named object to store the function, which makes it more readable and maintainable than the first option but still slower due to the overhead of creating an object. * Pros: More readable, maintainable, and easier to debug * Cons: Slower execution speed due to object creation 3. **Property definition using Object.defineProperty**: This approach uses a property descriptor to define the function name, which is more efficient than creating a new object or using a named object. * Pros: Fast execution speed, still readable and maintainable * Cons: Less intuitive for beginners, requires understanding of property descriptors 4. **Mangled assignment**: This approach assigns the function to itself with a mangled name, which can lead to confusion and is generally discouraged in production code. * Pros: None notable (it's just a variation of the first option) * Cons: Less readable, maintainable, and less debuggable **Other Considerations:** When evaluating these options, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between execution speed, readability, maintainability, and ease of debugging. **Alternative Approaches:** Additional approaches could be explored, such as: 1. Using a function constructor with an immediate invoked function expression (IIFE): `var f = new Function('j', 'return j;');` 2. Utilizing ES6 features like template literals or the `function` expression's default parameter: * `f = (...args) => args[0];` However, these alternatives might not be directly comparable to the original options in terms of performance and readability. For those interested in exploring alternative approaches or gaining a deeper understanding of JavaScript performance optimization techniques, I recommend checking out resources like MDN Web Docs, W3Schools, or online forums dedicated to JavaScript development.
Related benchmarks:
Replace Comparison
replaceAll replace deez nuts
Regex removing whitespace vs trimEnd
trim() vs replace()
jsreplace
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?