Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.min vs if1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Math.min() vs if
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = Math.random() * 1000 var b = Math.random() * 1000 var c = Math.random() * 1000
Tests:
Math.min()
return Math.min(a, b, c)
if
if (a < b && a < c) return a else if (b < c) return b else return c
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.min()
if
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares two approaches for finding the smallest of three numbers: using the built-in `Math.min()` function versus writing a custom conditional statement (an "if" statement). **Options Compared** 1. **Math.min()**: The first option uses the `Math.min()` function, which takes multiple arguments and returns the smallest value. 2. **Custom If Statement**: The second option writes a custom conditional statement that checks if each number is smaller than the others, returning the smallest one. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Math.min()**: * Pros: concise, efficient, and widely supported across browsers. * Cons: may not be as readable or maintainable for complex logic. 2. **Custom If Statement**: * Pros: can be more flexible and easier to understand for complex logic, but may be slower due to the need for multiple checks. * Cons: less concise, potentially slower, and less supported by older browsers. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark code uses any external libraries. The `Math.min()` function is a built-in JavaScript method that comes with the language itself. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark uses regular expressions in the script preparation code (`var c = Math.random() * 1000`), but this is not a special feature or syntax specific to modern browsers. It's simply a way to generate random numbers for testing purposes. **Other Considerations** When writing performance benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like: * **Randomization**: The use of `Math.random()` in the script preparation code introduces randomness, which can affect benchmark results. * **Browser Support**: Different browsers may handle JavaScript code differently. The provided benchmark only covers Mobile Safari 14 on iOS 14.0. * **Test Environment**: Factors like CPU speed, memory, and operating system can impact benchmark results. **Alternatives** Other approaches for finding the smallest of three numbers could include: * Using a simple sorting algorithm (e.g., `a = Math.min(a, b, c)`). * Utilizing a library or function specifically designed for finding minimum values (e.g., Lodash's `min` function). Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the original `Math.min()` approach.
Related benchmarks:
Sort Comparator IF statements vs OR (||) assignment
simple Math.max vs ternary
Math.min vs if
Math.Max() vs Ternary
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?