Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
console.log impact
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Without console.log; vs With console.log
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Without console.log;
let i = 10000, sum = 0; while(i --> 0) { sum += i; }
With console.log
let i = 10000, sum = 0; while(i --> 0) { sum += i; console.log(sum); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Without console.log;
With console.log
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing the impact of logging statements in JavaScript on performance. Specifically, it's comparing two scenarios: 1. **Without console.log**: The script executes without printing any log messages. 2. **With console.log**: The script prints a log message to the console at certain points during its execution. **Options compared:** The benchmark is comparing the performance impact of including or excluding console.log statements in the script. This suggests that the test is focusing on the overhead introduced by logging, which can affect the overall execution speed of the code. **Pros and cons of each approach:** * **Without console.log**: The obvious pro is reduced overhead, as there's no additional processing required to print log messages. However, this might lead to less accurate or informative output in certain situations. * **With console.log**: The con is increased overhead due to the additional processing required to print log messages. This could potentially slow down the execution of the script. **Library and syntax considerations:** There are no libraries mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines or environments might optimize logging behavior based on certain settings or configurations (e.g., `console.log` optimization). **Special JS feature or syntax:** None are explicitly mentioned. The test seems to focus solely on the impact of console.log statements. **Other alternatives:** If the benchmark were comparing more specific scenarios, it's possible that alternative approaches would be considered, such as: * Using a different logging library (e.g., Winston, Bunyan) * Implementing a custom logging mechanism * Comparing performance with and without using async/await or promises However, in this case, the test is focused on the basic impact of including or excluding console.log statements. To set up such a benchmark, you would need to create a script that includes and excludes the console.log statement, then run both versions through MeasureThat.net's testing infrastructure. The resulting data would provide insights into the performance impact of logging in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Console.log vs Empty log
with loggingbut better
Console.log string vs object
console log benchmark
Custom Event vs Callback with console log large
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?