Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
closure lookup
(version: 5)
Comparing performance of:
prototype function + "this" vs object function + closure vs capture method vs bind function vs wrap function vs prototype function + "this" (remove 1 scope)
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function serialize(obj){} var C1 = (function () { function C1() { this.idToObject = { a: 1 }; } C1.prototype.test = function () { serialize(this); this.idToObject.a++; }; return C1; }()); function createC2() { var idToObject = {a:1}; var self = { idToObject: idToObject, test: function () { serialize(self); idToObject.a++; } }; return self; } function C6() { this.idToObject = { a: 1 }; } C6.prototype.test = function () { serialize(this); this.idToObject.a++; }; var c1 = new C1(); var c2 = createC2(); var test3 = createC2().test; var c4 = new C1(); var test4 = c4.test.bind(c4); var c5 = new C1(); var test5 = function() { return c5.test(); }; var c6 = new C6();
Tests:
prototype function + "this"
c1.test();
object function + closure
c2.test();
capture method
test3();
bind function
test4();
wrap function
test5();
prototype function + "this" (remove 1 scope)
c6.test();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
prototype function + "this"
object function + closure
capture method
bind function
wrap function
prototype function + "this" (remove 1 scope)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test measures the performance of different approaches to creating and calling functions in JavaScript. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a script that creates and runs several functions, comparing their execution times. The scripts use different methods to create functions: 1. **Closure lookup**: `C1` function creates a new function using the Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE) pattern, which returns an object with a `test` method. 2. **Object function + closure**: `c2` function creates an object with a `test` method, similar to `C1`, but uses a different syntax. 3. **Capture method**: This approach uses the `bind()` method to create a new function that captures the scope of another function. 4. **Bind function**: This approach uses the `bind()` method to create a new function that binds the context of an existing object. 5. **Wrap function**: This approach wraps an existing function in a new function, creating a new scope. **Options compared:** The benchmark compares the execution times of these five approaches: 1. Closure lookup (IIFE) 2. Object function + closure 3. Capture method (bind()) 4. Bind function (bind()) 5. Wrap function **Pros and cons of each approach:** * **Closure lookup (IIFE)**: + Pros: Simple, efficient, and widely supported. + Cons: Can lead to issues with variable scoping and naming conventions. * **Object function + closure**: + Pros: More readable than IIFE, can be easier to understand for beginners. + Cons: May not be as efficient or compact as IIFE. * **Capture method (bind())**: + Pros: Allows for more control over the scope and context of a function. + Cons: Can lead to complex code and may not be as intuitive for beginners. * **Bind function (bind())**: + Pros: Simple and efficient, can be used to create functions with specific contexts. + Cons: May not be suitable for all use cases, as it modifies the original function's behavior. * **Wrap function**: + Pros: Allows for more control over the execution flow and error handling. + Cons: Can lead to complex code and may not be as efficient. **Library usage:** There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. However, the `serialize()` function is likely a custom utility function used to serialize objects for debugging purposes. **Special JS features or syntax:** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's commonly found in modern JavaScript implementations.
Related benchmarks:
closure lookup
prototype function
member lookup via prototype
closure vs proto2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?