Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
closure lookup
(version: 3)
Comparing performance of:
prototype function + "this" vs object function + closure
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function s(obj){} var C1 = (function () { function C1() { this.idToObject = { a: 1 }; } C1.prototype.test = function () { s(this); this.idToObject.a++; }; return C1; }()); var C2 = (function () { function C2() { var self = this; var idToObject = self.idToObject = {a:1}; self.test = function () { s(this); idToObject.a++; }; } return C2; }()); var c1 = new C1(); var c2 = new C2();
Tests:
prototype function + "this"
c1.test();
object function + closure
c2.test();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
prototype function + "this"
object function + closure
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into smaller parts to make it easier to understand. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition provides two JavaScript functions, `C1` and `C2`, which are then used in two separate test cases: "prototype function + 'this'" and "object function + closure". The functions are: * `C1`: A immediately invoked function expression (IIFE) that creates a new object with an `idToObject` property. When the `test` method of this object is called, it increments the value of `a` in `idToObject`. * `C2`: Another IIFE that creates an object with an `idToObject` property. However, instead of using the `this` keyword to access the object's properties, it uses a closure by assigning `self.idToObject = {a:1}` and then referencing `idToObject` within the `test` method. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: * **Prototype Function + "this"**: This approach uses the `prototype` keyword to create an object with methods. When the `test` method is called, it increments the value of `a` in `idToObject`. The use of `this` within the method allows for direct access to the object's properties. * **Object Function + Closure**: This approach creates an object with a closure that has access to its own properties. When the `test` method is called, it increments the value of `a` in `idToObject`. Unlike the prototype function approach, this one uses a closure to access the object's properties. **Pros and Cons** * **Prototype Function + "this"**: * Pros: * More straightforward syntax * Less memory-intensive since no additional objects are created for closures * Cons: * May be slower due to the overhead of using `prototype` * **Object Function + Closure**: * Pros: * Can provide better encapsulation and access control, as the closure is self-contained * Might be faster since no additional object creation is required for closures * Cons: * More complex syntax * May lead to slower performance due to the overhead of using closures **Other Considerations** * **Memory Usage**: The prototype function approach may use more memory than the object function approach, especially if dealing with large datasets. * **Performance**: The benchmark results are likely influenced by factors such as browser version, device platform, and operating system. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark uses the following special JavaScript features: * Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE): Used to create the `C1` and `C2` functions. * Object creation: Used to create objects with properties (`idToObject`) and methods (`test`). * Prototype keyword: Used in the prototype function approach. If not mentioned, I'll make sure not to mention it. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on anything else!
Related benchmarks:
closure lookup
prototype function
closure vs proto2
Class instance method lookup vs function-created object method lookup (fork)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?