Benchmark: native javascript vs lodash sort

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var test = [{"value":"97535676-acbb-41f4-b8ea-91e8e5e3fc0d","label":"Overview"},{"value":"f1e5845d-b5a4-4725-9813-f601eaed6826","label":"test 1"},{"value":"056d7e5a-b947-4c10-8b38-13416deebe4a","label":"Announcements"},{"value":"18149d83-8191-4c60-afca-d976f6f63ca5","label":"Browse buttons"},{"value":"20b145fa-14ae-457c-9fec-04fdd48ddba2","label":"ztest"},{"value":"00142552-9bf6-49a8-829d-152d8448ac5f","label":"Watson News"},{"value":"578695c6-4e4c-4c8d-ba8a-2ede7b6abd19","label":"Filtered"},{"value":"6b6fef15-a13e-423b-875d-7700737dccf4","label":"Curated"}]

Tests:

lowdash
_.sortBy(test, [ name => { const priority = ['overview']; if (_.includes(priority, name)) { return _.indexOf(priority, name); } else { return name.length; } }, name => name, ]);
JS
test.sort(function(a, b) { const valueA = a.label.toUpperCase(); const valueB = b.label.toUpperCase(); if (valueB === 'OVERVIEW') { return 1; } else if (valueA === 'OVERVIEW') { return -1; } return valueA < valueB ? -1 : valueA > valueB ? 1 : 0; });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lowdash
JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarking.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition and two individual test cases, comparing the performance of sorting an array using native JavaScript versus the `lodash` library.

**Test Case 1: Native JavaScript Sorting (JS)**

In this test case, the `test.sort()` method is used to sort the array of objects. The comparison function sorts the elements based on their label property in uppercase. If the label matches "OVERVIEW", it returns a specific value to prioritize it. Otherwise, it uses a simple string comparison.

**Test Case 2: Lodash Sorting (lowdash)**

In this test case, the `lodash.sortBy()` method is used to sort the array of objects. The benchmark definition includes a custom sorting function that takes into account the label property and its priority. If the label matches one of the values in the `priority` array, it returns its index; otherwise, it returns the length of the label.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functional programming helpers for tasks such as data manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this case, the `lodash.sortBy()` method is used to sort the array of objects based on custom criteria.

**JavaScript Feature: Sorting Functions**

In both test cases, sorting functions are used to compare elements in the array. This feature is a fundamental part of JavaScript arrays, allowing developers to customize the order of elements based on specific conditions.

**Pros and Cons Comparison**

* **Native JavaScript (JS)**:
	+ Pros: Uses built-in `sort()` method, which is efficient for small to medium-sized arrays.
	+ Cons: May be less efficient than specialized sorting libraries like Lodash for complex sorting tasks.
* **Lodash (lowdash)**:
	+ Pros: Provides a more customizable and flexible way of sorting arrays with complex criteria.
	+ Cons: Requires the loading of an external library, which may add overhead to the benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

For sorting array elements in JavaScript, you can use other libraries or approaches, such as:

* **Array.prototype.sort()**: Use the built-in `sort()` method with a custom comparison function.
* **Array.prototype.mapReduce()**: Apply a mapping and reduction operation on the array to sort it.
* **Other specialized libraries**: Consider using libraries like Ramda or Immutable.js for more complex data manipulation tasks.

**Considerations**

When choosing between native JavaScript sorting and Lodash, consider the following factors:

* **Complexity of sorting task**: If the sorting criteria are simple, native JavaScript may be sufficient. For more complex scenarios, a specialized library like Lodash can provide better performance.
* **Array size**: If the array is small to medium-sized, native JavaScript may be efficient enough. For larger arrays, consider using optimized sorting algorithms or libraries.
* **Library overhead**: If you're already using Lodash or another utility library, it might make sense to stick with it for consistency and reusability.

In this specific benchmark, Lodash's sorting performance was significantly lower than native JavaScript, likely due to the complexity of the custom sorting function. However, in real-world scenarios, the choice between native JavaScript and a specialized library like Lodash will depend on your specific requirements and trade-offs.

Related benchmarks:

native javascript vs lodash sort (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lowdash vs JS

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lowdash

JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one year ago):