Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs es6 in sort method
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash sort method vs es6 sort method
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [ { 'name': 'lim', 'age': 26 }, { 'name': 'kim', 'age': 28 }, { 'name': 'choi', 'age': 32 }, { 'name': 'park', 'age': 21 } ];
Tests:
lodash sort method
var result = _.sortBy(array, 'age');
es6 sort method
var result = array.sort((prev, cur) => prev.age - cur.age);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash sort method
es6 sort method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for sorting an array of objects: the `_.sortBy` function from the Lodash library and the built-in `sort` method with a custom comparison function in ECMAScript 6 (ES6). **Options Compared** There are two options compared: 1. **Lodash _.sortBy**: This function sorts the array using a stable sorting algorithm that preserves the original order of equal elements. 2. **ES6 sort method**: This is a built-in function in JavaScript that uses an unstable sorting algorithm, which can change the order of equal elements. **Pros and Cons** * **Lodash _.sortBy**: + Pros: Provides a stable sorting algorithm, handles complex sorting logic, and is easier to read and maintain. + Cons: Requires an additional library (Lodash), adds overhead due to the function call and object creation. * **ES6 sort method**: + Pros: Fastest execution time, uses built-in functions that are well-optimized by the JavaScript engine. + Cons: Unstable sorting algorithm, requires manual implementation of comparison logic, and may not handle complex cases correctly. **Library and Purpose** The Lodash library is a popular utility function collection for JavaScript. The `_.sortBy` function is one of its many functions that provides a convenient way to sort arrays using various sorting algorithms. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. The tests only use standard JavaScript and the `sort` method with a custom comparison function. **Other Considerations** When deciding between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to sort complex data structures (e.g., arrays of objects) or require a stable sorting algorithm, Lodash _.sortBy might be a better choice. * If you're working with simple sorted data and performance is critical, the ES6 sort method might be more suitable. * Keep in mind that the built-in `sort` method can be sensitive to edge cases, such as NaN (Not a Number) values or objects with non-standard properties. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for sorting arrays in JavaScript include: * Using the `Array.prototype.sort()` method without a custom comparison function (which is similar to the ES6 sort method but may not handle complex cases correctly). * Implementing a custom sorting algorithm using algorithms like merge sort, quicksort, or heapsort. * Using a different library that provides its own sorting functions, such as Underscore.js or Lodash alternatives. In general, when choosing a sorting approach, consider the size and complexity of your data, the required level of stability, and the performance requirements of your application.
Related benchmarks:
_.SortBy vs Sort
sortBy performance1
Sort lodash vs native
order desc with lodash orderBy vs es6 sort method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?