Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone big object 12345
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var MyObject = {"web-app": { "servlet": [ { "servlet-name": "cofaxCDS", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.CDSServlet", "init-param": { "configGlossary:installationAt": "Philadelphia, PA", "configGlossary:adminEmail": "ksm@pobox.com", "configGlossary:poweredBy": "Cofax", "configGlossary:poweredByIcon": "/images/cofax.gif", "configGlossary:staticPath": "/content/static", "templateProcessorClass": "org.cofax.WysiwygTemplate", "templateLoaderClass": "org.cofax.FilesTemplateLoader", "templatePath": "templates", "templateOverridePath": "", "defaultListTemplate": "listTemplate.htm", "defaultFileTemplate": "articleTemplate.htm", "useJSP": false, "jspListTemplate": "listTemplate.jsp", "jspFileTemplate": "articleTemplate.jsp", "cachePackageTagsTrack": 200, "cachePackageTagsStore": 200, "cachePackageTagsRefresh": 60, "cacheTemplatesTrack": 100, "cacheTemplatesStore": 50, "cacheTemplatesRefresh": 15, "cachePagesTrack": 200, "cachePagesStore": 100, "cachePagesRefresh": 10, "cachePagesDirtyRead": 10, "searchEngineListTemplate": "forSearchEnginesList.htm", "searchEngineFileTemplate": "forSearchEngines.htm", "searchEngineRobotsDb": "WEB-INF/robots.db", "useDataStore": true, "dataStoreClass": "org.cofax.SqlDataStore", "redirectionClass": "org.cofax.SqlRedirection", "dataStoreName": "cofax", "dataStoreDriver": "com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver", "dataStoreUrl": "jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://LOCALHOST:1433;DatabaseName=goon", "dataStoreUser": "sa", "dataStorePassword": "dataStoreTestQuery", "dataStoreTestQuery": "SET NOCOUNT ON;select test='test';", "dataStoreLogFile": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/datastore.log", "dataStoreInitConns": 10, "dataStoreMaxConns": 100, "dataStoreConnUsageLimit": 100, "dataStoreLogLevel": "debug", "maxUrlLength": 500}}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxEmail", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.EmailServlet", "init-param": { "mailHost": "mail1", "mailHostOverride": "mail2"}}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxAdmin", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.AdminServlet"}, { "servlet-name": "fileServlet", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.FileServlet"}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxTools", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cms.CofaxToolsServlet", "init-param": { "templatePath": "toolstemplates/", "log": 1, "logLocation": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/CofaxTools.log", "logMaxSize": "", "dataLog": 1, "dataLogLocation": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/dataLog.log", "dataLogMaxSize": "", "removePageCache": "/content/admin/remove?cache=pages&id=", "removeTemplateCache": "/content/admin/remove?cache=templates&id=", "fileTransferFolder": "/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/content/fileTransferFolder", "lookInContext": 1, "adminGroupID": 4, "betaServer": true}}], "servlet-mapping": { "cofaxCDS": "/", "cofaxEmail": "/cofaxutil/aemail/*", "cofaxAdmin": "/admin/*", "fileServlet": "/static/*", "cofaxTools": "/tools/*"}, "taglib": { "taglib-uri": "cofax.tld", "taglib-location": "/WEB-INF/tlds/cofax.tld"}}}; var myCopy = null;
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Json clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what this benchmark is testing. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two methods for cloning a large JavaScript object, `MyObject`. The two methods are: 1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: Using the `_cloneDeep` function from the Lodash library to create a deep copy of the original object. 2. **JSON Clone**: Using the built-in `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))` method to create a shallow copy of the original object. **What options are compared?** The benchmark is comparing the execution speed ( Executions Per Second ) of these two methods on a desktop computer running Chrome 80. **Pros and Cons:** * **Lodash cloneDeep**: + Pros: Deeply copies the entire object, including nested properties. + Cons: Requires importing the Lodash library, which may add extra overhead depending on the use case. * **JSON Clone**: + Pros: Lightweight and built-in, no additional dependencies required. + Cons: Creates a shallow copy, meaning it only copies the top-level properties and does not clone nested objects. **Other considerations:** The benchmark uses a large object with many nested properties to test both methods. The results show that Lodash `cloneDeep` is faster than JSON cloning, likely due to its optimized implementation and use of native functions. **Library used:** In this case, the library used is **Lodash**, specifically its `_cloneDeep` function, which is designed for deep copying of objects. No special JS features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (BIG OBJECT)
Lodash3 cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (BIG OBJECT)
Lodash cloneDeep vs clone vs spread
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs freeze and get - access a value
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?