Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs freeze and get - access a value
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
loadash vs json vs freeze and get
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {}; for (let i = 1; i <= 3000; i++) { obj[i] = i.toString(); }
Tests:
loadash
const myCopy = _.cloneDeep(obj); const value = myCopy[500];
json
const myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)); const value = myCopy[500];
freeze and get
const myCopy = Object.freeze(obj); const value = myCopy[500];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
loadash
json
freeze and get
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
loadash
6336.6 Ops/sec
json
2339.7 Ops/sec
freeze and get
4580349.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark tests the performance of three approaches for accessing values in a deeply cloned object: Lodash's `cloneDeep`, JSON cloning, and freezing and getting. **Approaches Compared** 1. **Lodash's `cloneDeep`**: This approach uses the `lodash.cloneDeep` function to create a deep copy of the original object. 2. **JSON Cloning**: This approach uses the `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))` method to create a deep clone of the original object. 3. **Freezing and Getting**: This approach freezes the original object using `Object.freeze()` and then accesses the value at index 500. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash's `cloneDeep`**: * Pros: Deep cloning is more flexible and can handle complex data structures, such as arrays with nested objects. * Cons: Lodash's cloneDeep function has a higher overhead due to its complexity and the need for additional dependencies. 2. **JSON Cloning**: * Pros: Simple and lightweight, making it suitable for small to medium-sized datasets. * Cons: Can be slower than `cloneDeep` due to the overhead of parsing JSON strings. 3. **Freezing and Getting**: * Pros: Fast and lightweight, with minimal dependencies required. * Cons: Only suitable for simple objects with a limited number of properties; freezing an object can lead to memory leaks if not used carefully. **Library and Its Purpose** In the benchmark, Lodash is a JavaScript library that provides various utility functions. The `cloneDeep` function is specifically designed to create deep copies of complex data structures. **Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** * In general, when working with large datasets, deep cloning can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new copy. However, `cloneDeep` provides more flexibility and is suitable for complex data structures. * JSON cloning is simple but may not be as efficient as `cloneDeep`. It's suitable for small to medium-sized datasets. * Freezing an object can lead to memory leaks if not used carefully, so it should only be used when necessary. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for deep cloning in JavaScript include: 1. `Array.prototype.slice.call()`: Creates a shallow copy of the original array. 2. `Object.assign()`: Creates a new object with copies of the properties from the original object. 3. `structuredClone()`: A relatively new function introduced in ECMAScript 2020, designed to create deep clones of complex data structures. Note that these alternatives may not be as efficient or flexible as Lodash's `cloneDeep` function.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Lodash clone vs Array.slice() vs. Object.assign()
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone with Array
cloneDeep vs JSON stringify + parse (long arr)
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs freeze and get - access a value 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?