Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone big object 12345
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var MyObject = {"web-app": { "servlet": [ { "servlet-name": "cofaxCDS", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.CDSServlet", "init-param": { "configGlossary:installationAt": "Philadelphia, PA", "configGlossary:adminEmail": "ksm@pobox.com", "configGlossary:poweredBy": "Cofax", "configGlossary:poweredByIcon": "/images/cofax.gif", "configGlossary:staticPath": "/content/static", "templateProcessorClass": "org.cofax.WysiwygTemplate", "templateLoaderClass": "org.cofax.FilesTemplateLoader", "templatePath": "templates", "templateOverridePath": "", "defaultListTemplate": "listTemplate.htm", "defaultFileTemplate": "articleTemplate.htm", "useJSP": false, "jspListTemplate": "listTemplate.jsp", "jspFileTemplate": "articleTemplate.jsp", "cachePackageTagsTrack": 200, "cachePackageTagsStore": 200, "cachePackageTagsRefresh": 60, "cacheTemplatesTrack": 100, "cacheTemplatesStore": 50, "cacheTemplatesRefresh": 15, "cachePagesTrack": 200, "cachePagesStore": 100, "cachePagesRefresh": 10, "cachePagesDirtyRead": 10, "searchEngineListTemplate": "forSearchEnginesList.htm", "searchEngineFileTemplate": "forSearchEngines.htm", "searchEngineRobotsDb": "WEB-INF/robots.db", "useDataStore": true, "dataStoreClass": "org.cofax.SqlDataStore", "redirectionClass": "org.cofax.SqlRedirection", "dataStoreName": "cofax", "dataStoreDriver": "com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver", "dataStoreUrl": "jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://LOCALHOST:1433;DatabaseName=goon", "dataStoreUser": "sa", "dataStorePassword": "dataStoreTestQuery", "dataStoreTestQuery": "SET NOCOUNT ON;select test='test';", "dataStoreLogFile": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/datastore.log", "dataStoreInitConns": 10, "dataStoreMaxConns": 100, "dataStoreConnUsageLimit": 100, "dataStoreLogLevel": "debug", "maxUrlLength": 500}}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxEmail", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.EmailServlet", "init-param": { "mailHost": "mail1", "mailHostOverride": "mail2"}}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxAdmin", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.AdminServlet"}, { "servlet-name": "fileServlet", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cds.FileServlet"}, { "servlet-name": "cofaxTools", "servlet-class": "org.cofax.cms.CofaxToolsServlet", "init-param": { "templatePath": "toolstemplates/", "log": 1, "logLocation": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/CofaxTools.log", "logMaxSize": "", "dataLog": 1, "dataLogLocation": "/usr/local/tomcat/logs/dataLog.log", "dataLogMaxSize": "", "removePageCache": "/content/admin/remove?cache=pages&id=", "removeTemplateCache": "/content/admin/remove?cache=templates&id=", "fileTransferFolder": "/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/content/fileTransferFolder", "lookInContext": 1, "adminGroupID": 4, "betaServer": true}}], "servlet-mapping": { "cofaxCDS": "/", "cofaxEmail": "/cofaxutil/aemail/*", "cofaxAdmin": "/admin/*", "fileServlet": "/static/*", "cofaxTools": "/tools/*"}, "taglib": { "taglib-uri": "cofax.tld", "taglib-location": "/WEB-INF/tlds/cofax.tld"}}}; var myCopy = null;
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Json clone
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Json clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two methods for creating a deep copy of a large JavaScript object: * **Lodash `cloneDeep`:** This method utilizes the Lodash library, a popular utility library for JavaScript that offers a wide range of functions, including efficient object cloning. * **Native `JSON` Clone:** This approach uses the built-in `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject))` method to create a copy. It serializes the object into JSON format and then parses it back into a JavaScript object. **Benchmark Results Interpretation:** The benchmark results indicate that Lodash's `cloneDeep` function is slightly faster (52845.49 executions per second) compared to the native `JSON` clone method (50039.97 executions per second). This difference, while noticeable, might not be significant in all practical applications, depending on the size of your objects and the frequency of copying operations. **Key Considerations:** * **Library Dependency:** Using Lodash introduces a dependency on an external library. While widely used and well-maintained, it adds extra code to your project. * **Performance Trade-offs:** For simple object structures, the native `JSON` clone might be sufficient. However, for complex objects with nested arrays or circular references, Lodash's `cloneDeep` might offer better performance and handle these scenarios gracefully. **Recommendation:** If you frequently need to deep copy complex JavaScript objects and prioritize performance, consider using Lodash's `cloneDeep`. Otherwise, the native `JSON` clone method can be a viable option for simpler use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (BIG OBJECT)
Lodash3 cloneDeep vs JSON Clone (BIG OBJECT)
Lodash cloneDeep vs clone vs spread
Lodash cloneDeep vs JSON Clone vs freeze and get - access a value
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?