Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Push vs Concat Test
(version: 0)
Spread vs Push vs Concat Test
Comparing performance of:
Push Case vs Spread Case vs Concat Cas
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Push Case
const arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c']; const arr2 = ['d', 'e', 'f']; const result = arr1.push(...arr2);
Spread Case
const arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c']; const arr2 = ['d', 'e', 'f']; const result = [...arr1, ...arr2];
Concat Cas
const arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c']; const arr2 = ['d', 'e', 'f']; const result = arr1.concat(arr2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Push Case
Spread Case
Concat Cas
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking test. **Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of three different ways to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: `push` with the spread operator (`...`), using the spread operator directly on an array, and using the `concat` method. The goal is to determine which approach is the most efficient. **Options Compared** There are three options compared: 1. **Push with Spread Operator**: This involves calling the `push` method on an existing array and passing a new array (or its elements) as an argument. 2. **Spread Operator Directly**: This involves using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by spreading the elements of another array. 3. **Concat Method**: This involves using the `concat` method to concatenate two arrays. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Push with Spread Operator**: * Pros: Simple, concise, and widely supported. * Cons: Can lead to unnecessary re-creation of intermediate arrays, which can negatively impact performance. 2. **Spread Operator Directly**: * Pros: Avoids re-creation of intermediate arrays, making it more efficient than `push` with spread operator. * Cons: Requires explicit use of the spread operator (`...`), which might be unfamiliar to some developers. 3. **Concat Method**: * Pros: Well-established and widely supported, makes it easier to reason about performance. * Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to the creation of intermediate arrays. **Library Usage** None mentioned in this benchmark. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is used in two out of the three options. This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has since become a standard part of modern JavaScript. **Other Considerations** In addition to performance, other factors such as code readability, maintainability, and compatibility with older browsers should be considered when choosing an approach. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches that might be worth considering include: 1. **Array.prototype.push.apply()**: This method can also be used to push elements onto an array, but it's not as widely supported or well-known as the `push` method. 2. **Array.prototype.reduce() + Array.prototype.push()**: This approach involves reducing an initial array to a single value and then pushing new elements onto it. While efficient, it might be less readable than using the spread operator directly. In conclusion, while there are trade-offs between each approach, the spread operator directly is likely the most efficient option due to its ability to avoid re-creating intermediate arrays. However, code readability and maintainability should also be considered when choosing an approach.
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push Brian
spread operator vs push Brian2
Array concat vs spread operator vs push larger list
Array concat vs spread operator vs push + spread 2023-08-21
zk test spread vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?