Benchmark: NATIVEvsRAMDA - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

obj1 = {
    gridOptions: {
      defaultColDef: {
        resizable: true,
        sortable: true,
        floatingFilterComponentParams: {
          suppressFilterButton: true,
        },
      },
      floatingFilter: false,
      floatingFiltersHeight: 46,
      headerHeight: 40,
      suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true,
      suppressHorizontalScroll: true,
      suppressNoRowsOverlay: true,
      suppressRowClickSelection: false,
      suppressScrollOnNewData: true,
      rowSelection: 'single',
      rowHeight: 40,
    },
    customParams: {
      pagination: true,
      isCheckboxVisible: false,
      isActionsColumnVisible: true,
    },
  }

Tests:

Ramda
return R.mergeDeepRight(obj1)({ columnDefs: { companyRegistrationNo: {}, fullName: {}, shortName: {}, vatNo: {}, ncage: {} }, defaultColumns: [ 'fullName', 'shortName', 'companyRegistrationNo', 'vatNo', 'ncage', ], gridOptions: { defaultColDef: { resizable: true, sortable: true, }, headerHeight: 40, suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true, suppressHorizontalScroll: true, suppressNoRowsOverlay: true, suppressRowClickSelection: true, suppressScrollOnNewData: true, rowSelection: 'multiple', rowHeight: 40, }, customParams: { isCheckboxVisible: false, isActionsColumnVisible: false, pagination: true, translationModule: 'MODULE_ORGANIZATIONS_CIVIL', }, });
Native
return {...obj1, columnDefs: { companyRegistrationNo: {}, fullName: {}, shortName: {}, vatNo: {}, ncage: {} }, defaultColumns: [ 'fullName', 'shortName', 'companyRegistrationNo', 'vatNo', 'ncage', ], gridOptions: { defaultColDef: { resizable: true, sortable: true, }, headerHeight: 40, suppressDragLeaveHidesColumns: true, suppressHorizontalScroll: true, suppressNoRowsOverlay: true, suppressRowClickSelection: true, suppressScrollOnNewData: true, rowSelection: 'multiple', rowHeight: 40, }, customParams: { isCheckboxVisible: false, isActionsColumnVisible: false, pagination: true, translationModule: 'MODULE_ORGANIZATIONS_CIVIL', } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmarking test.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is represented by the JSON object provided, which defines two individual test cases: "Native" and "Ramda". Both tests aim to compare the performance of JavaScript code in creating and merging objects using different approaches.

**Options Compared**

There are three main options compared:

1. **Native**: This option uses the native JavaScript `Object.assign()` method to merge objects.
2. **Ramda**: This option uses the Ramda library's `R.mergeDeepRight()` function to merge objects.
3. **Custom**: There is also a custom approach provided, but it seems like it's not being used in this benchmark.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Native (Object.assign())**:
	* Pros: Widely supported, easy to use, and well-documented.
	* Cons: Can be slower than other approaches for large objects or complex merge operations due to the overhead of creating new objects and copying properties.
2. **Ramda (R.mergeDeepRight())**:
	* Pros: More efficient and faster than native `Object.assign()` for large objects or complex merge operations, thanks to its optimized implementation.
	* Cons: Requires an external library (Ramda) to be included in the test, which may not be ideal from a performance perspective.
3. **Custom Approach**: Not being used in this benchmark.

**Library and Purpose**

The Ramda library is a popular JavaScript functional programming library that provides various utility functions for tasks like data processing, manipulation, and optimization. In this case, `R.mergeDeepRight()` is used to merge objects recursively, which is more efficient than the native `Object.assign()` method.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in these benchmarks. The code looks like standard JavaScript.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for merging objects, here are a few options:

1. **Lodash**: Another popular JavaScript utility library that provides an `_.merge()` function for merging objects.
2. **Immutable.js**: A library specifically designed for working with immutable data structures and functions for merging objects.
3. **Object.create()**: A more low-level approach to creating new objects by specifying a prototype.

Keep in mind that the choice of library or approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.

Related benchmarks:

NATIVEvsRAMDA (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs Native

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):